Template talk:CC BY-SA 2.0

Note: It is proposed that this template be changed to what is listed on Wikipedia talk:Image copyright tags#CC templates proposal. We welcome comments on this proposal. – Quadell ^{(talk) (help)}[[]] 17:48, Dec 1, 2004 (UTC)

Please use 90px thanx. --Paddyez 01:23, 4 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Interwiki

Please add an interwiki link to the Vietnamese version of this template:

[[vi:Tiêu bản:Cc-by-sa-2.0]]

Thanks.

– Minh Nguyễn (talk, contribs) 02:23, 5 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Plz, add ruwiki [[ru:Шаблон:CC-BY-SA-2.0]] Alex Spade 13:47, 19 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Cheers. --MZMcBride 18:04, 19 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Attribution details

Can attribution details (to allow one to specify to whom a photo is to be credited) please be added to this template, as is specified in the license itself (and as we have for 2.5)? Thanks, Badagnani 19:22, 19 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Protected edit

{{editprotected}} The wikilink on "this image" is pretty pointless and creates a needless extra entry in "what links here." east.718 at 16:12, August 12, 2007

Done. Cheers. --MZMcBride 19:52, 12 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Update design to match 3.0

2 things: if the 3.0 template isn't protected anymore, does this one really still need to be?

Second thing (if the first can't be done), can this be updated to basically match the 3.0 template, since the design of that template's a lot more attractive?

{| {{CC-Layout}}
|-
| [[Image:CC_some_rights_reserved.svg|90px|Creative Commons License]]<br />[[Image:Cc-by new white.svg|24px|Creative Commons Attribution icon]][[Image:Cc-sa white.svg|24px|Creative Commons Share Alike icon]]
| ''This work is licensed under the [[Creative Commons]]<br /> Attribution ShareAlike License version 2.0:<br />http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.0/{{#if:{{{1|}}}|<br />Attribution: {{{1|}}}}}''
|}<includeonly>[[Category:Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.0 images]]</includeonly><noinclude>
==Usage note==
To provide attribution use ''{{Cc-by-sa-2.0|Attribution details.}}''. The "attribution details" should indicate how you wish your image to be attributed when it is reproduced.

:''Other Creative Commons templates are available at '''[[Wikipedia:Image copyright tags]]'''. Please be sure to use the right one.''

[[Category:Image copyright tags|{{PAGENAME}}]]
</noinclude>

—Preceding unsigned comment added by Lincalinca (talk • contribs)

Done. - auburnpilot talk 17:45, 14 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Commons

On Commons this is Template:Cc-by-sa-2.0. --GeorgHH (talk) 08:32, 14 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

KA

please add Georgian interwiki

[[ka:თარგი:Cc-by-sa-2.0]]

Done, though for future reference, the interwikis are in the doc page which isn't protected. — Tivedshambo (t/c) 21:36, 14 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Edit request from Mhiji, 13 December 2010

{{edit protected}} Could someone please move the "This template should only be used on file pages." sentence from the template to the /doc? Thanks Mhiji (talk) 13:18, 13 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Why? JamesBWatson (talk) 21:00, 14 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'm inclined to reverse the question, and ask is there any reason it isn't in the doc? It looks rather untidy in it's current position. It's also incorrect, as presumably it's acceptable to use this template for other media files (videos, sound etc.) — Tivedshambo (t/c) 21:33, 14 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Images of non-free works

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

I've implemented a tweak in the sandbox version, namely {{#ifeq:|{{{dw|no}}}|no|{{free media}}|}} instead of coding {{free media}} directly. Specfiying dw=yes will supress the categorisation in Category:All free media, for derivative works where the subject shown is non-free, and thus can't be moved to Commons.

It would be appreciated if this straightforward change was implemented in the main template. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:58, 25 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Please remember to update the docs as well. — Mr. Stradivarius ^{♪ talk ♪} 10:59, 25 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Non-File namespace template

Is there an alternative to this template for use on pages not in the File namespace? Tule-hog (talk) 03:10, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]