Talk:King Fahd Causeway

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the King Fahd Causeway article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Bahrain High‑importance

	Bahrain portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bahrain, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Kingdom of Bahrain on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BahrainWikipedia:WikiProject BahrainTemplate:WikiProject BahrainBahrain articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Saudi Arabia Mid‑importance

	Saudi Arabia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Saudi Arabia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Saudi Arabia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Saudi ArabiaWikipedia:WikiProject Saudi ArabiaTemplate:WikiProject Saudi ArabiaSaudi Arabia articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Bridges and Tunnels Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bridges and Tunnels, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of bridges and tunnels on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Bridges and TunnelsWikipedia:WikiProject Bridges and TunnelsTemplate:WikiProject Bridges and TunnelsBridge and Tunnel articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Transport

	Transport portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Transport, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TransportWikipedia:WikiProject TransportTemplate:WikiProject TransportTransport articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Civil engineering Mid‑importance

	Engineering portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Civil engineering, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Civil engineering on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Civil engineeringWikipedia:WikiProject Civil engineeringTemplate:WikiProject Civil engineeringCivil engineering articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Dam

I deleted the word 'dam.' I am no expert on construction, but don't dams hold something back? This has the sea on both sides. Paul, in Saudi 17:27, 26 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Viaducts

Article claim 2 viaducts on the way (without sources), but structurae claims 5 viaducts with exact informations. Can someone clarify situation? --Jklamo 01:55, 10 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Using GoogleEarth i verified, that structurae datas are correct and i modified article according that. --Jklamo 02:37, 10 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Name

I think it should be renamed to King Fahad Causeway, I also have a photo taken on the bridge it self, let me know if you want me to upload it. Radiant guy (talk) 22:54, 3 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Expansion cost query

The figure given of $5.3m for a major project expansion as described above seems oddly low -- whatever the 'local newspapers' cited may reportedly be cited quoting! Note, meanwhile, that another regional media source reported the preliminary estimated headline project cost to be Saudi riyals 1.06bn. Source: http://www.alaswaq.net/articles/2010/08/14/36515.html [SR/USD rate currently = USD 0.27. Source: FX rates search via Google, as of mid-Feb 2011]. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.93.170.100 (talk) 22:07, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Causeway? Or a (low) bridge?

Is it a causeway, like a dyke, or a bridge near the sea surface? 14.0.208.87 (talk) 00:15, 23 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It is a combination of multiple bridges and causeways. --Jklamo (talk) 00:25, 23 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Construction details

The article claims the road "was built using 350,000 m³ (12,000,000 cu ft) of concrete along with 47,000 metric tonnes of reinforced steel." What is "reinforced steel"? The author is probably thinking of reinforcement steel, but arguable not all the steel in the bridge is used for reinforcement of concrete. ehn (talk) 15:19, 15 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem removed

Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.arabnews.com/news/531026. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and according to fair use may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Diannaa (talk) 16:47, 19 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on King Fahd Causeway. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://archive.is/20120909220012/http://www.saudinf.com/main/g13.htm to http://www.saudinf.com/main/g13.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:52, 6 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on King Fahd Causeway. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:17, 10 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]