User talk:Wouterhagens
Welcome
[edit]Hello, welcome to Wikipedia.
You can help improve the articles listed below! This list updates frequently, so check back here for more tasks to try. (See Wikipedia:Maintenance or the Task Center for further information.)
Help counter systemic bias by creating new articles on important women.
Help improve popular pages, especially those of low quality.
You might find these links helpful in creating new pages or helping with the above tasks: How to edit a page, How to write a great article, Naming conventions, Manual of Style. You should read our policies at some point too.
If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. If you made any edits before you got an account, you might be interested in assigning those to your username. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian!
- If you made any edits before you got an account, you might be interested in assigning those to your username.
- You can sign your name using three tildes, like this: ~~~. If you use four, you can add a datestamp too.
- If you ever think a page or image should be deleted, please list it at the votes for deletion page. There is also a votes for undeletion page if you want to retrieve something that you think should not have been deleted.
Again, welcome! - UtherSRG 20:51, 17 Feb 2004 (UTC)
Geraniums
[edit]Hi Wouter - you've put some nice photos on the Cranesbill page. Can you say what species they are? To me they look more like Pelargoniums than Cranesbills and I wonder if you could have been led astray by the confusion of common name and genus with geranium? seglea 05:04, 29 Apr 2004 (UTC)
Licence for Image
[edit]Hi Wouter, Im Igelball from German Wikipedia. The Image
I had put at the German Wikipedia. Please can you write which Licence it have (GFDL or Public Domain). Thank You!
- This image also needs licence information Image:Viburnum opulus.jpg. Thanks --nixie 08:52, 13 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Also, Image:Actinidia.jpg needs license information. --Ricky81682 (talk) 21:05, Dec 19, 2004 (UTC)
Statue in Rethymno
[edit]Sorry it has taken so long for a reply, but I've been searching around and asking, and unfortunately I have not been able to find any information about the statue. I'll keep looking however. El Greco(talk) 21:14, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
Analytic Hierarchy Process
[edit]Thank you VERY MUCH for establishing this Commons category and linking it to the Wikipedia article on AHP. I've uploaded some other AHP-related media, and now I can put 'em in a category. You are doing valuable work. Lou Sander (talk) 16:54, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
Angela James Bowl
[edit]Thanks you so much for your photo. --Geneviève (talk) 17:51, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
a special Wikicookies for you
Dirty Projectors
[edit]Hi! Thanks for adding an image to the Dirty Projectors page. Unfortunately, the image you posted is not of the same Dave Longstreth that is in the band. (You can do a Google search to see what Dave Longstreth looks like.) Therefore I've deleted the picture you added to the page.
No hard feelings though. Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia, and good luck in your future endeavours. wia (talk) 15:10, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks, that avoids that I add the wrong categories to the image in Commons. Wouterhagens (talk) 17:31, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:15, 30 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]
Hello, Wouterhagens. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]Hello, Wouterhagens. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Hi Wouterhagens, thank you for adding the picture of Ronald J. Ross to my article. This article's purpose is still hampered by a disclaimer that it was "written by someone close to the subject". I would like this removed. First of all, I am neither related or paid by the subject, he was someone I was acquainted with nearly 30 years ago, and the article itself is a rather dry and objective commentary focused on the subject's provable accomplishments. How can I get this disclaimer removed from the article? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Raffyross (talk • contribs) 15:46, 8 March 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Wouterhagens. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Wouterhagens. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Question
[edit]Why would you add a photo to the article if you weren't sure of who the person in the photo was? DS (talk) 18:35, 26 December 2020 (UTC)
- Photos that have no category in Wikimedia Commons are usually untraceable by third parties and are lost for further use. When there is an article on a Wikipedia where such a photo can possibly be used, I try to check through the references whether it is the right person. In this case, the official website no longer exists and is for sale. I do not use Twitter and Facebook. When I post the photo without "PLEASE check .." chances are that others will accept it as correct and use it that way. Those who contributed to the article will find it easier than me to see if the photo is the right person or not and adjust the accompanying text. Often they are happy that a photo is added to the article. I hope that this answers you question. Wouterhagens (talk) 19:23, 26 December 2020 (UTC)
- Have you checked on archive.org? DS (talk) 00:03, 28 December 2020 (UTC)
- No. When you can figure it out, go ahead. As I said, it is often very easy for those who wrote the text of the article to tell if the photo represents the right person. I put a page like this on my watchlist until it is clear about the photo. If it is correct I can change the category of the photo and add it on the wikidata page. Wouterhagens (talk) 10:27, 28 December 2020 (UTC)
- Have you checked on archive.org? DS (talk) 00:03, 28 December 2020 (UTC)
I'd also like to ask you to stop adding images in situations like this. The image you added to Jesse Walters, which is clearly not of Jesse Walters, remained in the article for five and a half years five months. Your expectation that others will clean up after you might hold on some prominent articles, but is not reasonable in the context of more obscure topics. – Arms & Hearts (talk) 12:46, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
Request edit template
[edit]Hi Wouterhagens, I noticed that you added Template:Request edit to a bunch of articles asking about photos. The request edit template is for users who have a conflict of interest with the subject of the article, either as a paid contributor or because they know the subject personally. Do you have a conflict of interest with these people? If you do, you must declare it on the article talk page, perhaps underneath your original message (you don't need to say how you know the person, just that you have a COI with them). Alternatively, you can make the declaration on your user page. See WP:DISCLOSE for more details. If you do not have a COI, can you remove the templates? If you have any questions, please post below (and ping me if you want). Thanks and happy editing! Z1720 (talk) 20:39, 1 January 2021 (UTC)
- @Z1720: I did this on advice of @Arch dude: given in Wikipedia:Help_desk#Adding_an_image_to_an_article. If I should do it different, please tell me how. Thanks Wouterhagens (talk) 20:59, 1 January 2021 (UTC)
- I have responded on the help desk thread. Z1720 (talk) 21:59, 1 January 2021 (UTC)
Nomination of Chah Bardi, Kohgiluyeh and Boyer-Ahmad for deletion
[edit]
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chah Bardi, Kohgiluyeh and Boyer-Ahmad until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
Since you added an image to the article of the putative village, the information in the image will need to be double-checked. Based on geocoordinateds of this putative settlement, we think the actual name of the village shown is probably Sar Peri. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 00:40, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
