Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Second row

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was redirect to Rugby union positions. moink 02:10, 10 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Second Row

Not needed as Rugby union positions already exists and has more detail. The title is also bound to cause problems.GordyB 09:31, 25 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Redirect to Rugby union positions - a much more comprehensive article Anilocra 15:11, 26 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Redirect to Rugby union positions. Megan1967 06:58, 27 Apr 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.