Talk:Secret police

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Secret police article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1

Human rights Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Human rights, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Human rights on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Human rightsWikipedia:WikiProject Human rightsTemplate:WikiProject Human rightsHuman rights articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Law Enforcement Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Law Enforcement. Please Join, Create, and Assess.Law EnforcementWikipedia:WikiProject Law EnforcementTemplate:WikiProject Law EnforcementLaw enforcement articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Second Sentence Seems Like Bullsh*t

Like the title says. It seems to me that you can't make a claim like that unless you're willing to label every Western liberal democracy as 'authoritarian' or 'totalitarian'. Organisations, programs, systems dedicated to spying on citizens... Have we forgotten what Edward Snowden exposed? Finch-WingedHussar (talk) 02:31, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Finch-WingedHussar: If you're requesting an edit, you need to post it in a "please change 'X' to 'Y'" format, and don't forget to include sourcing to support your proposed changes. - wolf 04:23, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Edward Snowden is a hypocrite who sold his soul to Putin's Russia. He exposed dubious practices by Western intelligence agencies, sure, but he is strangely silent about the heinous recent actions of his new hosts. He was willing to risk things when exposing the sins of the West, but is not willing to take similar risks by commenting on Russia's sins. Hmmm... 2A0A:EF40:122D:7801:9840:7E14:1C33:BCEA (talk) 13:53, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

These aren't 'similar risks' - he would be guaranteed to lose everything if he were to attack Putin, too, because there is no place left for him to flee to. Every country is either a US ally or a Russian ally. The man obviously wants to have a life and personal happiness now and he has that right - he has already made a far greater sacrifice for his principles than most people ever do. You have no right to ask him to commit harakiri as punishment for having defended Americans' rights. As far as I remember, he expected to be able to return to the US soon after the scandal, because he thought that the Western public would appreciate his sacrifice and would pressure politicians to pardon him. It is not his fault that he overrated the Western public, which has, overall, proved unworthy of this sacrifice and willing to accept the infringement of its own rights; and that such a large part of said public, like you, actually wants the person who defended its rights to be punished for it and the intelligence agencies to be able to do whatever they want to it.--62.73.72.3 (talk) 16:09, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

In the Roman Empire

Should the frumentarii be added to the list of secret police forces? I💖平沢唯 (talk) 04:56, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]