Talk:Andamanese languages

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Andaman and Nicobar Islands (assessed as High-importance).

Languages

	Language portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Languages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of languages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LanguagesWikipedia:WikiProject LanguagesTemplate:WikiProject Languageslanguage articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Archives

/Archive 1

Question

The article says: "By the latter part of the 20th century the majority of Great Andamanese languages had become extinct, as the multi-lingual knowledge of the older generations was not replaced in succeeding ones." This seems to suggest a process of language shift. Is it really true? From what I've heard, those populations died out and their languages died with them, so it isn't simply a sociolinguistic matter, right?Youkbam (talk) 03:10, 27 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Blevins 2007

"Blevins 2007" needs an actual citation either in the footnotes or in the bibliography. (Taivo (talk) 05:29, 2 January 2010 (UTC))[reply]

Well, I had actually added it a long time ago, but kwami then decided to move it to the Onge article, apparently believing it was too specific to Ongan languages. Anyway, it's back now. I still think that the Blevins 2007 quote is too long and that the clssification section gives undue weight to "splitters", though. (remember that here, unlike with other proposed language families, the usual crackpots are splitters, with more serious authors either supportive or agnostic; of these, Brown was a non-linguist and all others mentioned are "outsiders" with the exception of Manoharan and Abbi) Ko'oy (talk) 13:46, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Bo language

Should there be something about the Bo language, referred to here?--212.183.140.16 (talk) 17:38, 4 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Honestly, that's a terrible piece of journalism, full of factual mistakes and obvious misrepresentations. Definitely not a "reliable" source. Try this one instead: http://www.andamanese.net/. As for the death of the "last Bo speaker" (which is doubtful, really; on the website, Abbi only says that Boa spoke Jeru with a heavy influence of Bo), we should mention it in the Great Andamanese languages article, not here. But then again, let's wait for an update from Abbi's website.Ko'oy (talk) 01:19, 5 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If the BBC retracts it, it can be deleted. --Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) (talk) 01:33, 5 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If Abbi says the person didn't speak Bo, then that's the end of the issue. It doesn't matter what a BBC reporter says, Abbi is the reliable source when it comes to Andamanese languages. (Taivo (talk) 01:49, 5 February 2010 (UTC))[reply]

Exactly. It's not an established fact that Boa "spoke Bo". All we know for sure (at least that's what the website says right now) is that she had some knowledge of Bo and mixed it with Jeru when speaking in GA; in that sense she probably is "the last speaker of Bo" (though not in the way suggested by BBC)... So let's wait for a more authoritative source to give the last word. The author of that article might be a good reporter, but he obviously has no clue about this subject (most of the background info is wrong!).Ko'oy (talk) 02:57, 5 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Apparently, Boa herself claimed that she spoke Jeru. (Taivo (talk) 04:26, 5 February 2010 (UTC))[reply]

Indian settlers?

" Their linguistic

diversity also suffered as the
surviving populations intermingled
with one another, and some also
intermarried with Karen (Burmese)
and Indian settlers."

It should be "settlers from Indian mainland" or "continental India". Present wording gives a wrong impression that Andamanese people are not Indians. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.231.110.174 (talk) 04:00, 14 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Are the Burmese Indians? Because they were all part of the same British colony. The Andamanese were not (and are not) part of Indian culture & civilization. — kwami (talk) 10:13, 14 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Andamanese languages. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:25, 12 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Andamanese languages. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20040405014303/http://www.southasiabibliography.de/Bibliography/Andamanese/andamanese.html to http://www.southasiabibliography.de/Bibliography/Andamanese/andamanese.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:21, 4 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]