User talk:Ironman419

Hello, welcome to Wikipedia. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian. You can learn more on the how to edit page. The naming conventions and style guide pages are also useful. There is a sandbox which you can use to experiment in. If you have any questions, see the help pages or add a question to the village pump. If you ever think a page or image should be deleted, please list it at the votes for deletion page. There is also a votes for undeletion page if you want to retrieve something that you think should not have been deleted. Angela 08:11, 24 Aug 2003 (UTC)

Reconquista infobox

Thankyou for leaving a comment on my talk page. The reason I removed the infobox—besides my general dislike of infoboxes—is that the Reconquista is far too complex to be dealt with as if it were a war. It has no definite beginning, even though it has a definite end. Furthermore, the idealogy of "Reconquista" was fluid and changing and not all events which saw land under Moslem domination fall into Christian hands can be described as "Reconquista" events, while many non-military activities also led to the extension of Christian rule over lands which had ceased to be Christian-ruled. I will divulge that one of my interests has long been to find an obvious and defensible periodisation of the Reconquista, but I believe it to be too lengthy a "conflict" to be covered in the same way the Hundred Years' War is. There was a constant idealogy of Reconquista in Christian Iberia and over time this led to the reconquest of all of Iberia which had come under Muslim control, but this is a process more like the democratisation of government in England, in my opinion, than like a long war. All this said, the Reconquista article needs much more attention than just the addition an infobox. Srnec 04:47, 10 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:186px-Benigno Repeki Fitial.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:186px-Benigno Repeki Fitial.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 23:15, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

May 2008

Hi, the recent edit you made to John McCain has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. J.delanoy ^gabs _adds 17:57, 15 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Ealdgyth of Wallingford

I have nominated Ealdgyth of Wallingford, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ealdgyth of Wallingford. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. role^player 22:48, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:53, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Sæward of Essex for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sæward of Essex is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sæward of Essex until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

JMWt (talk) 11:52, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]