Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Central Avenue
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete --cesarb 01:29, 12 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Some 600,000 Google hits, but less than 1 ‰ mention Cedarhurst. Besides the bad name, the article provides very little information, let alone any facts that might establish notability. Rl 16:20, 25 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge with Cedarhurst - unless anyone fancies creating the disambig from hell! --Doc (?) 18:20, 25 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete unless someone wants to make that dab mentioned by Doc. Arbitrarily picking Cedarhurst as the Central Avenue is inane. I'm sure the one is Albany (to name but one) is just as significiant. -R. fiend 19:36, 25 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- This article is linked to from Albuquerque, New Mexico and List of sites of interest in the Los Angeles area, indicating that others have claim to the name, too. ☺ This is almost certainly going to end up as Central has. Uncle G 21:44, 2005 May 25 (UTC)
- Nothing should link here. This isn't Broadway where there is one that is far and away the most significant of streets with that name. The best we could do is have some list of all the cities that have a "Central Ave", which would be very long and very useless. -R. fiend 21:56, 25 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- True, but until this article appeared those were dangling hyperlinks, awaiting articles. If they are both roads worthy of note, then eventually one would link to Central Avenue, Albuquerque, New Mexico and the other to Central Avenue, Los Angeles, California, and Central Avenue would be a disambiguation, ending up, as I said, as Central has, many of whose inbound links were adjusted (by me) to point to the real articles on 2005-04-17 exactly because nothing should link to the disambiguation. Uncle G 16:19, 2005 May 26 (UTC)
- Nothing should link here. This isn't Broadway where there is one that is far and away the most significant of streets with that name. The best we could do is have some list of all the cities that have a "Central Ave", which would be very long and very useless. -R. fiend 21:56, 25 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- This article is linked to from Albuquerque, New Mexico and List of sites of interest in the Los Angeles area, indicating that others have claim to the name, too. ☺ This is almost certainly going to end up as Central has. Uncle G 21:44, 2005 May 25 (UTC)
- Delete. There are many Central Avenues, and this one isn't notable. Quale 00:47, 26 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete and mention in Five Towns and individual town articles. Gazpacho 02:13, 26 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge as a heading and then make this a DAB. Use any other Central Avenue to add to some other city article so that the DAB is a valid page. Vegaswikian 06:10, 26 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, non-topic. Radiant_* 13:37, May 26, 2005 (UTC)
- This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.