Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Australian National Flag Association
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was keep. Rossami (talk) 02:19, 8 Feb 2005 (UTC)
POV rant. Copyvio? RickK 07:10, Jan 25, 2005 (UTC)
- I would suggest Keep and clean up. I'm sure that the Australian National Flag Association [1] is notable enough to have an article on it. However, the article as it stands is a POV rant. I would clean it up but commitments for Australia Day tomorrow (ironically enough) will limit my time availability until Monday or Tuesday. I will either clean it up then or alternatively recreate it from a red link and I wouldn't blame anyone for voting to delete the article as it stands. Capitalistroadster 10:18, 25 Jan 2005 (UTC)
- Keep. Preemptive thanks to Capitalistroadster for doing his part in making Wikipedia a better resource. GRider\talk 18:18, 25 Jan 2005 (UTC)
- Keep. However, I'm going to make it a stub. I could not find the exact site the text is from, but it screams "press release". So just to make sure, I'm making it a stub. --Woohookitty 20:39, 25 Jan 2005 (UTC)
- Strong keep. This organization has been widely quoted in the Australian media for many years.--Centauri 02:59, 26 Jan 2005 (UTC)
- The organization is notable as one of the two well-known lobby organizations on the issue. Keep. Uncle G 12:37, 2005 Jan 27 (UTC)
- 'keep Yuckfoo 05:08, 29 Jan 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. There is a long discussion under Australian flag of arguments for and against retaining the current flag. The two "organizations" that are involved in this issue can be mentioned in that context. An article for the Australian flag, plus one for each of two groups arguing about the design of the flag, is two too many. --BM 15:35, 30 Jan 2005 (UTC)
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.