Talk:History of the British penny (1714–1901)

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the History of the British penny (1714–1901) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1

History of the British penny (1714–1901) is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.

This article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on October 11, 2018.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
July 26, 2017	Featured article candidate	Promoted

Numismatics: British currency Mid‑importance

	Numismatics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Numismatics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of numismatics and currencies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NumismaticsWikipedia:WikiProject NumismaticsTemplate:WikiProject Numismaticsnumismatic articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the British currency task force.

United Kingdom Low‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Pre-merge archive: Talk:History of the British penny (1837-1901)

1797 penny

It would appear I have one of the 1797 pennies, passed to me from my father, the date is worn off, so I guess it won't be a valuable one, but it's cool to even have something so old. It has Brittannia facing left, it has G (L?) ...I I I D (G or C) and a king portrait facing R, the profile is distinctive in that the profile is almost a straight line from forehead to nose-tip

I would guess that its George III. --THobern 16:40, 7 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The pennies of King William IV (1830–1837) are very similar to his predecessors', also being engraved by William Wyon. The king's head faces right, inscribed GULIELMUS IIII DEI GRATIA date, while the reverse is identical to the George IV penny. Pennies were minted in 1831, 1834, and 1837 (there is a report of a single example dated 1836, but this is regarded as semi-mythical). The small mintages of William's pennies makes finding a nice one very difficult.

I found the above statement on one of the pages of this website. It says there were none made in 1836. I have one that has the date 1836 stamped on it. However, the number 3 is upside down. Can anyone shed light on this?

Lighthouse

"until 1895 there was a lighthouse to Britannia's left and a ship to her right": an interpretation board at Smeaton's Lighthouse, now on Plymouth Hoe, claims that the lighthouse on the obverse of the pre-decimal British penny is the Eddystone Lighthouse, a recognition of the pride of the British people of the technical achivement of erecting this innovative building. Is this correct? Does the lighthouse on the old penny represent the Eddystone? Vernon White ^{. . . Talk} 07:51, 15 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Tuppence Disambiguation

Why does Tuppence (Disambiguation) redirect to HoBP? I was looking for Tuppence used as a girls name which I think it has been a few times. Can't see any discussion over this previously. Double Think 08:37, 19 December 2015 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Luv2cucum (talk • contribs)

No idea. The Tuppence (disambiguation) page seems to have been created by a bot in 2010, and the only other time it was edited was by another bot. Just goes to prove that "machine intelligence" is a contradiction in terms. -- Arwel Parry (talk) 22:28, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Boulton and Soho Mint

"Even though pennies were struck first, reserving the twopences for later, the Soho Mint had trouble stamping such large pieces of copper, and Boulton built a new mint at Soho, where by 1799, each press was striking 60 pennies a minute."

Would it not be clearer to say "..the existing Soho Mint had trouble.." if that is what is intended to be implied?—not that I know of Boulton constructing more than one. Harfarhs (talk) 20:25, 11 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I don't recall the specifics of the construction, but that seems like good language.--Wehwalt (talk) 23:17, 11 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Twopence, threepence and fourpence

"The Roman numeral I on the coins dated from the reign of James II, and was at first intended to denote the King's initial in Latin (IACOBUS) but was kept a Roman numeral when the twopence, threepence, and fourpence were given Arabic numerals under William and Mary."

I added one link here; I wanted to add three, but the articles Twopence (British pre-decimal coin) and Fourpence (British coin) relate only to specific coinages well outside the time period indicated in the paragraph. (Indeed, the twopence article seems to say that there was no such coin before 1797.) Perhaps "fourpence" could be wikilinked with Groat (coin), but I did not feel confident enough that that was the intended meaning. Assuming that the text here is correct, this problem, if it be a problem, of course relates chiefly to the other articles and not this one about pennies. Harfarhs (talk) 11:28, 12 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]