Talk:Sijo

A fact from Sijo appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 6 April 2004. The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that the Korean poetic form of sijo resembles the Japanese poetic form of haiku?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2004/April.

Wikipedia

Poetry Mid‑importance

	Poetry portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Poetry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of poetry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoetryWikipedia:WikiProject PoetryTemplate:WikiProject PoetryPoetry articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Korea Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Korea, a collaborative effort to build and improve articles related to Korea. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how use this banner, please refer to the documentation.KoreaWikipedia:WikiProject KoreaTemplate:WikiProject KoreaKorea-related articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by one or more inactive working groups.

spelling

Since both Romanization systems spell it 'sijo,' I don't suppose it should be changed, but since it is pronounced /shIjo/ I wonder if this can be indicated in some way. Why? 1) Any-one not conversant with Korean but who has (only) HEARD the word will never think to look for it under 'si.' 2) Some-one coming across the article is given no indication of how it's pronounced and could be quite embarrassed and confused, trying to talk to a Korean about "s-eye-Joe." Kdammers 19:05, 4 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I have no problem with that. I'd rather not get into the morass of ad-hoc phonetic spelling, though... I guess the ideal solutions would be either a) write the pronunciation in IPA script, or b) find a native speaker who is willing to be recorded pronouncing the word. -- Visviva 07:02, 5 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with Visviva on the two preferred alternatives. Kdammers 17:28, 7 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Huh? Word missing in text?

"Sijo is often more lyrical and personal than (e.g., other East Asian poetic forms)" This sentence is grammatically wrong. Perhaps the original writer can correct it to reflect what s/he meant to type. I think some-thing from the next idea (lyrical vs. personal) accidentally got pasted over the original content? Kdammers 06:55, 27 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

waka

This article seems to imply that waka is derived from sijo. Is this true, arguable, false, misleading or what? (See waka article and discussion) . Kdammers 01:02, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

IPA

The IPA given uses ɕ- This is correct for the original Korean pronunciation. But is this the way it should be represented in English? Wouldn't/Isn't it rather pronounced with an initial "sh" (/ʃ/ sound? As it now stands, a user not knowing any Korean (or Swedish or other language using the ɕ- sound) can be expected to go to the IPA for English page and come up blank - NOT GOOD. Can't we fix this whith-out sacrificing correctness and clarity? !!!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kdammers (talk • contribs) 01:48, 6 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This seems like a valid complaint. Perhaps the IPA could be, in this case, accompanied by an ad hoc pronunciation ("shee-jo")? Or maybe there is another solution? -- Visviva 16:13, 11 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

YUN Seondo's sijo

I changed the modern Korean version of YUN Seondo's sijo, because the previous did not preserve rhythm. For reference, here is what we had before. --AZ

나의 벗이 몇인가 헤아려 보니 수석과 송죽이라.

동산에 달이 밝게 떠오르니 그것은 더욱 반가운 일이로다

나머지는 그냥 두어라. 이 다섯 외에 더 있으면 무엇하겠는가? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.83.45.98 (talk) 11:28, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

State of the article

See: Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Korea#Sijo. Opencooper (talk) 23:42, 22 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]