Talk:Jem'Hadar

Star Trek Low‑importance

	This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Star Trek, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to all Star Trek-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the redirect attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Star TrekWikipedia:WikiProject Star TrekTemplate:WikiProject Star TrekStar Trek articles
Low	This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

Request, some info on the 'shroud', the Jem'Hadar abillity to cloak. It's unclear if it is entirely technological, some books (like 'Section 31:Abyss') make reference to them needing to maintain concentration.--Chairboy 07:07, 9 Sep 2004 (UTC)

Article needs to make a mention of the Indian military rank jemadar, on which the name "Jem'Hadar" is clearly based. DS 15:47, 25 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I'd always wondered whether or not that was deliberate. Have we got a link to an interview or something in which one of DS9's scriptwriters says as much, or is this still speculation? 85.65.84.15 03:05, 4 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I believe that the refusal of the first in charge of the prison in the episodes "By Inferno's Light 1 and 2" to finish Worf during their bout despite being ordered to by the Vorta should be included. This provides valuable insight into Jem'Hadar ethics/values and the extent of their free will.- [concerned Star Trek Geek] 04:26, 3 March 2006 (EST)

Volume

Can someone please replace "10-15 cm" in this line in the Biology and Control section:

It is administered through 10-15 cm cylinders

With an actual measure of volume? --EEMeltonIV 19:00, 16 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Shrouding

While I have some doubts about the whole "test of loyalty" in this page... my real issue HAS to be with the Shrouding. I feel it wasn't exactly explicit in Shoals... show proof! Don't quote episodes... but you know, more specific. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 86.131.159.19 (talk) 01:41, 9 December 2006 (UTC).[reply]

I removed the circular link to "Ketracel White". Kinda silly havking a link on the page which links back to the page it's on. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.222.131.122 (talk) 05:20, 16 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]