Talk:Public participation (decision making)

Politics Mid‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Sociology Mid‑importance

	Society portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sociology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sociology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SociologyWikipedia:WikiProject SociologyTemplate:WikiProject Sociologysociology articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Important people to cite (for Amercian politics, anyway) would include Sidney Verba, Kay Schlozman, Steven Rosenstone, John Mark Hansen, and Robert Putnam, to name a few. --Michael.Stone 22:33, 13 Jan 2005 (UTC)

For the sake of good form I should note that the comments I added in reference to A Ladder of Citizen Participation is run by me. --DuLithgow 21:52, 22 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I have added some other people whose definitions of participation were influenced by Arnstein's. I have no links for the articles, but if anyone does, it woul dbe wonderful to include them. The articles are famous and easy to find with a simple Google Scholar search I think.--24.18.231.242 07:34, 10 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Political Participation

There needs to be a section on this... civics and etc. --HoO8MyRiCe

Deep Democracy

Seems to me like a new great tool... I would like to give it a chance... So could you check the website before doing a fast erase... Could you maybe advise me how to spread about the concept?..

Olivier C (fr) (talk) 20:34, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Overlap between participation articles

I was looking at the articles on participation, and I noticed that they are not very coordinated and they overlap quite a bit. I'm starting a discussion about this at Talk:Participation#Overlap_between_participation_articles. Any help is appreciated! MakeBelieveMonster (talk) 16:27, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ongoing work here to map the topic through the wikidata item : https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q1773152 Jeanne Noiraud (talk) 16:39, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The EPIC Generation

This reference is a self-published book by a known self-promoting sockpuppet. I highly doubt you will find any relevant, reliable, and independently published articles by him on the subject, but if you do, please feel free to replace the reference.

<ref name="The EPIC Generation">{{cite book | last = Fadul | first = Jose | authorlink = | coauthors = | year = 2010 | title = The EPIC Generation: Experiential, Participative, Image-Driven & Connected | page = 19 |publisher = Lulu Press | location = Raleigh, NC | isbn = 978-0-557-41877-0}}</ref>

66.108.94.198 (talk) 01:52, 1 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Just some ideas for change:

This article has the potential to be very successful because what it is describing is political participation, however this is entirely from a Global North or Westernized perspective. It would also be important to look at the global youth and emerging adult population from not just participation from a statistical or political perspective, but to consider the sociological implications of involvement (i.e.- participation as well). For example, look into the Chavez election in Venezuela, where the NY Times declared the youth changed the election. Pull regionally, not from individual countries necessarily, and avoid the Western European countries because they have a similar perspective to that of the United States.

This article has a clear skew, but it can be fixed! Never be concerned, because this is a good start! Ask if you ever need help or anything fixing it! Jduden (talk) 17:44, 22 February 2013 (UTC)jduden[reply]

I just added a section to this page, addressing participation beyond the economic,political, & management domains mentioned in the overall definition. Cultural was left out and so some addition of Indigenous American Cultures as inputted to add some variety and out look. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Risilva (talk • contribs) 03:04, 9 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Participation (decision making). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110608090645/http://www.wiley.com/bw/journal.asp?ref=0888-8892 to http://www.wiley.com/bw/journal.asp?ref=0888-8892

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:28, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relevance

I believe that this article could use an update of material and include several, far more recent examples and events of appropriate material. Sources could be updated as many more academic publishings have been released and highly touted. ~~~~~ PeterStyx (talk) 15:59, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]