Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eric Elliot
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. —Xezbeth 21:15, Jun 1, 2005 (UTC)
Non-notable, creative-writing, joke, whatever. Zero relevant hits for "Eric Elliot" neutron or "Eric Elliot" Leominster. Niteowlneils 21:32, 25 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- What is this? There is only one paragraph that makes this worth considering: "Towards the end of his junior year, Eric participated in a field trip to France. His illicit escapades there nearly had him deported and have become infamous around the globe." If anyone knows why, please extend this paragraph. Otherwise, it is just a small biography of an unimportant person. Is the creator "Eric Elliot", himself, or does the creator know him well? I'm going with Delete until we can find out if there is anything worthwhile to add. Sonic Mew 22:43, May 25, 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. Maybe I'm not terribly perceptive, but shouldn't global infamy give off at least one relevant google hit? Scimitar 23:03, 25 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete vanity. - Etacar11 00:11, 26 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete vanity. Econrad 00:41, 26 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, not notable, vanity. Megan1967 06:24, 26 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: Vanity. Nothing notable. I suspect quite a bit of it is made up. --Durin 00:36, 27 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. not encyclopedic. - UtherSRG 13:28, May 28, 2005 (UTC)
- This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.