Template talk:RAF WWII strategic bombing

This template is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom articles

Aviation

This template is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles

Military history: Aviation / National / British / European / World War II

This template is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Associated task forces:
/
	Military aviation task force
	National militaries task force
	British military history task force
	European military history task force
	World War II task force

Comments

Why the devil is Guy Gibson listed in this? He had no particularly prominent role, at least not more prominent that many other RAF officers I could name trivially? Noel (talk) 17:00, 25 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Does Monte Cassino relate to this template? Gangleri | Th | T 21:48, 2005 Mar 20 (UTC)

No it was a tactical attack not a strategic one -Philip Baird Shearer 11:49, 4 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

need add Mitchell to aircraft, for not many time 1 or 2 squadrons of BC used this — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.234.224.199 (talk) 18:56, 22 March 2012 (UTC) also Fortress — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.234.224.199 (talk) 19:01, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]