Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Heavens Tower
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. Mindspillage (spill yours?) 16:29, 5 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Fictional places that appear in one single video game usually shouldn't have their own articles, in my opinion. RPGs in the Final Fantasy and Dragon Quest series often have dozens of cities, and it would be silly to have articles for each one of them. Crotalus horridus 21:36, 22 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- If things "shouldn't have their own articles" feel free to merge/redirect them somewhere without bringing them to Vfd. Kappa 23:35, 22 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: Fancruft. If the original author gets link happy in the Final Fantasy XI article and then has to go along and create a link for every noun, that's tragic, but the fact remains that this is a title that will not be sought by anyone who doesn't already know what it is. Geogre 02:53, 23 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Wikipedia is not a dictionary. Kappa 21:51, 23 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to Windurst. I understand giving individual cities in the game their own entry, given the nature of the game, but giving individual landmarks their own entry is pushing it a little. – Seancdaug 03:35, May 23, 2005 (UTC)
- Delete, not notable, fancruft. Megan1967 06:15, 23 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete fancruft. JamesBurns 10:42, 24 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete fancruft. carmeld1 01:49, 25 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete nn cruft. Leanne 05:48, 25 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.