User talk:Sasha Slutsker

132

Maybe there isn't a webpage just about 132 as an expletive, but if you can show me a couple of Web pages illustrating this (something like a brand-name website would be best, but even techies' blogs will do), I will re-add this to the page on 132 and revert anyone who tries to delete it again. Anton Mravcek 21:23, 10 Aug 2004 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Chuck Floyd

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Chuck Floyd, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

this article is about a person whose notability is questionable.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Triple3D 10:41, 4 April 2009 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Triple3D (talk • contribs) [reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of First Amendment (disambiguation)

I have nominated First Amendment (disambiguation), an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/First Amendment (disambiguation). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. ThaddeusB (talk) 00:22, 24 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]