Talk:History of mathematics

	History of science portal This article is part of the History of Science WikiProject, an attempt to improve and organize the history of science content on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. You can also help with the History of Science Collaboration of the Month.History of ScienceWikipedia:WikiProject History of ScienceTemplate:WikiProject History of Sciencehistory of science articles
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

Mathematics Top‑priority

	Mathematics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mathematics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of mathematics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MathematicsWikipedia:WikiProject MathematicsTemplate:WikiProject Mathematicsmathematics articles
Top	This article has been rated as Top-priority on the project's priority scale.

History Top‑importance

	History portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the subject of History on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Historyhistory articles
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

Archives (index)

1

This page has archives. Sections older than 120 days may be automatically archived by when more than 5 sections are present.

Best notational system?

"The notational system of the Babylonians was the best of any civilization until the Renaissance"

Boyer, C.B. (1991) [1989], A History of Mathematics (2nd ed.), New York: Wiley, ISBN 978-0-471-54397-8

This doesn't make sense even though it's sourced. Europeans imported hindu numerals during the Renaissance, they didn't invent them, therefore the Renaissance did not produce a new notational system, therefore that quote is misleading and very euro-centric. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.222.148.189 (talk) 20:49, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

David dclork li is a block evader

This comment was used to delete a long post by the person named. I had fixed some of his many mistakes in English, and if the deleted information is incorrect of course it should be removed. But if the information is correct, it should not be deleted no matter who posted it. Rick Norwood (talk) 09:50, 18 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

European numbers

there are no European numbers, those are Arabic numbers. 2603:7000:DFF0:14F0:A585:7FC7:720E:E45C (talk) 03:20, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The actual Arabic numerals are ٠١٢٣٤٥٦٧٨٩ (see Eastern Arabic numerals). The numbers that, in English, are often known as "Arabic numerals" are derived from those, but they aren't the numerals actually used in much of the Arabic-speaking world. So calling them "European" distinguishes them. Largoplazo (talk) 10:25, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]