Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Delimited
Delimited was proposed for deletion. This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was
This anon user seems to just be creating a bunch of pages to publicise his/her programs. AlistairMcMillan 21:24, 15 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Delimitation is an important CS concept. This article is a shoddy discussion of delimitation and a blatant advertisement. Delete with prejudice and hot sauce. -- Antaeus Feldspar 21:40, 15 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- It's now less shoddy, and not an ad. Why did you think it couldn't be improved? Factitious 10:51, Dec 16, 2004 (UTC)
- Agree that it's a blatant advertisement. However, now that I have deleted the commercial stuff, I feel that it's a worthwhile stub. Keep. [[User:GeorgeStepanek|GeorgeStepanek\talk ]] 22:26, 15 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- can we merge it with Delimiter, perhaps? -- Antaeus Feldspar 22:50, 15 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Not sure. There should certainly be links between the two concepts. A delimiter is used in a delimited file, but it has other uses too. I would prefer to see two articles. [[User:GeorgeStepanek|GeorgeStepanek\talk ]] 22:57, 15 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- can we merge it with Delimiter, perhaps? -- Antaeus Feldspar 22:50, 15 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Keep, no longer a blatant ad. [[User:GRider|GRider\talk]] 00:45, 16 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Comment: Are you guys adding it to your watchlist? The original author seemed to be pretty determined to use us for advertising, and I wouldn't be shocked if he overwrote your rewrites. Geogre 05:13, 16 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Maybe move to delimited computer data. This could even be computer data format. Aside: my back garden is delimited as well. Should I disambuig/complete this "article" ? Gtabary 09:46, 16 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- How about just delimited data? Factitious 10:51, Dec 16, 2004 (UTC)
- For a split second there I almost thought Geogre was going to vote keep. Well, I did it for him. —[[User:Radman1|RaD Man (talk)]] 09:51, 16 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Keep. Looks fine now. Nice work, GeorgeStepanek. Factitious 10:51, Dec 16, 2004 (UTC)
- Keep and watch then, it's useful. Wyss 11:08, 16 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Keep in current form. --fvw* 19:51, 2004 Dec 16 (UTC)
- Merge the improved version with delimiter. - Andre Engels 12:32, 17 Dec 2004 (UTC)
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion or on the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.