Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sessile

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was KEEP. Postdlf 09:36, 9 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Sessile

Virtually identical to its wiktionary entry, and not likely to grow further. Grutness|^hello? 03:21, 3 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

It could describe sessile organisms in nature, common threads among and differences between them, evolution and adaptation, etc. It could provide context beyond what could be included in the article of any given sessile organism, and unless there's a synonym for sessile, elsewhere that I can think of. Inbound links. Keep. Samaritan 04:10, 3 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
(expanded) Keep, potential for further organic growth and possible budding off. Kappa 10:21, 3 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Lots of sessile critters live on the Pacific Coast Klonimus 05:25, 4 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, and expand. Legitimate biology article. Megan1967 11:13, 5 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.