Talk:Legendary
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Legendary page. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This disambiguation page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
Requested move
[edit]- The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: No consensus. Jafeluv (talk) 02:20, 23 October 2010 (UTC)
Legendary → Legendary (disambiguation) — This title should redirect to Legend. I take it as given that the primary topic of "legendary" is "of or referring to a legend", in which case have a dab page makes no sense. The meaning of "hagiography" is covered in the lead of the legend article. Srnec (talk) 03:39, 9 October 2010 (UTC)
Survey
[edit]- Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with
*'''Support'''or*'''Oppose''', then sign your comment with~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's policy on article titles.
- Support. I had previously suggested that there was no clear primary topic, but I think I was mistaken, and that this move would be good. However the mentions of Hagiography and the South English Legendary should be left in here. Legend should be linked at the top, per MOS:DAB. HTH. -- Quiddity (talk) 03:48, 9 October 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose. This is not Wiktionary so it doesn't follow that a topic is primary merely because the word is etymologically related. If some types "legendary", it doesn't necessarily follow that he is searching for "legend". (If he were, he would likely type the shorter "legend".) The dab page should remain the target of legendary. — AjaxSmack 03:59, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
- Agree with AjaxSmack. Someone looking for something specifically named "legendary" may likely be looking for something other than the etymologically derived association. older ≠ wiser 14:01, 16 October 2010 (UTC)
Discussion
[edit]- Any additional comments:
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.