Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thomas Weinandy

Originally a copyvio on someone of no discernable significance. →Raul654 04:29, May 12, 2004 (UTC)

Delete. If the organisation he's an office-holder of doesn't have an article, I don't think he's significant enough to need one. --Stormie 04:47, May 12, 2004 (UTC)

Delete, not interesting. Pfortuny 07:16, 12 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to the office that he's not yet in charge of. Somone'll fill in the blanks. Alcarillo 15:58, 12 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]

KEEP - This Thomas Weinandy is like the Asimov of books on religion and theology! He certainly is a good candidate for Wikipedia. Hey, I find Michael Moore not interesting should we delete him? Just because this man is not known, as well as Bob Dylan, or interest in him is lacking by those not interested in his subject matter, doesn't make his obvious contribution to his field insignificant. I think he has a lot more behind him than a lot of listings. User: Pitchka
Keep. Article has been un-copyvio-ed, repaired and expanded since listing. Significant author. - Hephaestos|§ 23:14, 17 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, article seems fine. Rhymeless 07:35, 18 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]