User talk:Kroome111
Welcome!
Additional tips:
- Here are some extra tips to help you get around Wikipedia:
- If you want to play around with your new Wiki skills, try the Sandbox.
- Click on the Edit button on a page, and look at how other editors did what they did.
- You can sign your name using three tildes, like this: ~~~. If you use four, you can add a datestamp too. Always sign comments on Talk pages, never sign Articles.
- You might want to add yourself to the New User Log
- If your first language isn't English, try Wikipedia:Contributing to articles outside your native language
Mel Etitis (Μελ Ετητης) 21:17, 11 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Cricket image sources
[edit]Hello Kroome111,
I'm trying to sort out the copyright status of all the cricket images we have, so that they don't get deleted for lack of copyright notice. I see you've added a few, which is great. But I wasn't clear which ones you'd taken yourself, or where you'd got the others from. I found these five:
- Image:Paul_Grayson.jpg
- Image:UpminsterPark.jpg
- Image:Andy_Flower.PNG
- Image:Graham_Gooch.PNG
- Image:Acook.JPG
Can you let me know the sources of these? Thanks very much,
Stephen Turner 15:36, 28 September 2005 (UTC)
- Perfect, thanks for adding the copyright tags. Stephen Turner 09:20, 29 September 2005 (UTC)
- Kevin, I know I said this was OK, but apparently it's not. Someone deleted Image:Acook.JPG because he said the attribution was insufficient. I had a conversation with him about it, and... well, maybe it's easiest if you just read the conversation here. I suggest you upload the Alastair Cook image again, and then add the name of the photographer and either {{PD}} or {{GFDL}} as applicable to all your images. Thanks, and sorry. Stephen Turner (Talk) 11:42, 8 December 2005 (UTC)
Image Tagging Image:Ggooch1.JPG
[edit]This media may be deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading Image:Ggooch1.JPG. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then there needs to be an argument why we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then it needs to be specified where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, consider reading fair use, and then use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other media, consider checking that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sherool (talk) 13:15, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
Image copyright problem with Image:Acook.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading Image:Acook.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 12:18, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
Cricket Images
[edit]Hi there. Thanks for your many contributions of cricket images. Just so that you know, I've been moving a few of them across to Wikimedia Commons. Commons is a repositry for free images and other media. Amongst other advantages, it allows the various different language Wikipedias to use your images. I have altered all of the articles that use the images to point at the copy on Commons, so that the copies on the English Wikipedia can be deleted in seven days. Below are the copies I have made so far, I will add more as I go along! →Ollie (talk • contribs) 02:52, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
- Image:Acook.jpg --> Commons:Image:Alastair Cook Essex 2005.jpg
- Image:Ggooch1.JPG --> Commons:Image:Graham Gooch 2005.jpg
- Image:Milott.jpg --> Commons:Image:Mark Ilott 2002.jpg
- Image:Ggooch.jpg --> Commons:Image:Graham Gooch 01.jpg
- Image:Acook2.JPG --> Commons:Image:Alastair Cook.jpg
- Image:Will Jefferson.jpg --> Commons:Image:Will Jefferson.jpg
- Image:Ryan ten doeschate.JPG --> Commons:Image:Ryan ten Doeschate.jpg
Fair use rationale for Image:Acook.JPG
[edit]Thanks for uploading Image:Acook.JPG. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.
Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 14:48, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:56, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]Hello, Kroome111. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Kroome111. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Kroome111. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)