Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Biostitute
Appearance
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was DELETE. jni 18:53, 11 Mar 2005 (UTC)
Neologism, not suitable for transwiki --nixie 00:24, 4 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. BTW it's a possible copyvio from http://www.1hope.org/glossary.htm Miss Pippa 09:38, 5 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. Dicdef, neologism, not in widespread use. Average Earthman 23:03, 5 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. I concur that this looks to be copyvio. Not-notable, dicdef, neologism, copyvio, {{and a partridge in a pear tree}}. --Deathphoenix 16:15, 8 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Concur with Deathphoenix's elegant summary. Delete - David Gerard 17:38, 8 Mar 2005 (UTC)
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.