User talk:195.229.241.180

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Lunawada. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Harland1 15:42, 8 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

November 2007

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to IPCC Fourth Assessment Report, you will be blocked from editing. Spellcast (talk) 06:11, 19 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Effects of nuclear explosions, you will be blocked from editing. Excirial^{(Talk,Contribs)} 10:51, 21 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 months in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. Chris 10:55, 21 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

March 2008

Your recent edit to Nancy Ajram (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! // VoABot II (talk) 09:51, 22 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Kambaksh

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Kambaksh, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Kambaksh. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 20:54, 30 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Divyanka Tripathi, you will be blocked from editing. Xiong Chiamiov ::contact:: ^help! 08:12, 3 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

April 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Toy Story, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Toy Story was changed by 195.229.241.180 (u) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2008-04-07T07:38:52+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 07:38, 7 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

May 2008

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits, such as the one you made to Humanism.
If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. Aunt Entropy (talk) 16:17, 27 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

July 2011

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Fashion. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. McGeddon (talk) 13:10, 21 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Consignment stock, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 08:35, 9 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

February 2012

Thank you for your interest in editing Wikipedia. Your edit to Zamzam Well was successful, but because it was not considered beneficial to the page, the edit has been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment with editing, please use the sandbox instead. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you.--Wagino 20100516 (talk) 12:48, 1 February 2012 (UTC)--[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Mansoor Ijaz with this edit, did not appear to be constructive, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. RA0808 ^talk _contribs 19:30, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

May 2012

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is invited to contribute, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Saxon Shore, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Maine12329 (talk) 13:52, 5 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Tally Solutions

The article Tally Solutions has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Very minor ERP and accounting software vendor. Some industry awards, but nothing to lift it past WP:MILL. Distinctly lacking in external sourcing too.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Andy Dingley (talk) 01:41, 1 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

February 2013

Hello, I'm Xeltran. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Sabah because it didn't appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Xeltran (talk) 05:19, 21 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edit to Levant constitutes vandalism and has been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Donner60 (talk) 04:48, 27 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

March 2013

Hello, I'm Shadowjams. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to Remote access policy, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, Shadowjams (talk) 05:24, 21 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Tgeairn. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to Ellen MacArthur, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, Tgeairn (talk) 08:01, 24 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Ellen MacArthur with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Tgeairn (talk) 08:03, 24 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

May 2013

Hello, I'm Shadowjams. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to Body modification, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, Shadowjams (talk) 06:40, 7 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

June 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to List of universities and colleges in the United Arab Emirates may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

* [[http://www.acd.ac.ae American College of Dubai]

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 11:06, 24 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

July 2013

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits like you did on Microsoft SharePoint. I have reverted your edits. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Jianhui67 (talk) 10:50, 25 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

September 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Varuthapadatha Valibar Sangam may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

'''''Varuthapadatha Valibar Sangam--'''''English translation: Worryless Youths Club) is a 2013 Tamil comedy film directed by Ponram, a former assistant of directors [[M. Rajesh]] and [

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 06:40, 15 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Tally Solutions

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Tally Solutions, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.
It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Fiddle Faddle 15:22, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Kay Adams-Corleone for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kay Adams-Corleone is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kay Adams-Corleone until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 11:24, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.