Wikipedia:Requests for comment/User conduct disputes archive/RickK

He is a deletionist prejudiced against me trying to censor my posts at Hittite because of influence from Ben (at first nick-naming me Ibero-Hurrian man and refering to myposts as nonsense, but who has since in some way appoloigized for misjudging me) Wetman & Llywrch. I try Wiki policy and Wikiquette but he totally ignores all my requests for discussion of differences. I have drunk so much tea I think I may be an addict now. Zestauferov 10:02, 19 Feb 2004 (UTC)

Seems like everybody who crosses you is a problem user. Oh, well. Your edit history speaks for itself. You're a Georgian nationalist trying to rewrite the history of Europe in order to make it seem like Georgians have always been in their land, despite the history that the rest of the world seems to know. I am not prejudiced against you, I don't even know you. I just don't like the idea of seeding Wikipedia with false data. RickK 02:09, 20 Feb 2004 (UTC)

I am not Georgian, I am British, and of Prussian-Jewish extraction and I live in Seoul, Korea. Where do you get these ideas from? Someone is feeding you lies. Zestauferov 01:10, 21 Feb 2004 (UTC)

Maybe a confusion with user:Levzur. Secretlondon 20:00, Feb 27, 2004 (UTC)

User:RickK is he a Nazi or not?? User:RickK claims that half of Poland belongs to Germany, and German names should be used for Polish cities in English Wikipedia. This is precisely a Nazi behaviour. User RickK threatens other users that he will block them just for calling Nazi behaviour a Nazi behaviour. This is precisely a Nazi behaviour. We have to do something or Neo-nazis like Rick will kill our memory about victims of the Nazis. Mestwin 05:31, 27 Feb 2004 (UTC)

Rick: you can threaten me or kill me, but others wiil come and call you the proper name you deserve.

I don't think I need to comment on this. RickK 05:35, 27 Feb 2004 (UTC)

RickK is not neutral in these conflicts, and I suggest he is excluded from dealing with Nazi articles. I especially demand that RickK stops reverting and blocking people just because he dosn't like them or their views. If Rick thinks somebody should be blocked - Let him allow other privileged users decide for him. Mestwin 06:34, 27 Feb 2004 (UTC)

RickK actually claims to be Jewish as far as I remember but his knowledge of things pertaining to the Jewish people is appaulingly inaccurate. The main problem is apparently that he is a vey sloppy reader even apparently confusing me with User:Levzur. It does not help that since he has become an administrator he deems himself beyond criticism and would rather mirror an accisation than deal with it. I am combining your complaint against him with mine from below. Zestauferov 04:28, 28 Feb 2004 (UTC)

I've never claimed to be Jewish. I am not Jewish. I gew up in a fundamentalist Protestant family, but I prefer to consider myself agnostic leaning towareds pagan. RickK 07:28, 28 Feb 2004 (UTC)

My appologies, I must have confused your religion with someone else's. That at least clears up a lot of confusion I had about your apparent opposition to themes pertaining to Jewish traditon. Zestauferov 07:46, 2 Mar 2004 (UTC)

You were thinking of user:RK in all likelyhood. I just figured out the difference last night. Sam Spade 08:32, 2 Mar 2004 (UTC)

RickK is an admin who abuses his privileges. Apparently others think so as well. He is on my list, although he is not #1 since he is not a total idealogue on some sort of jihad like Ed Poor. Richardchilton 09:50, 3 Mar 2004 (UTC)

So far as I know, I have never had a single dealing with Richardchilton, which should show that he is, indeed, someone else with a new name. RickK 02:55, 4 Mar 2004 (UTC)