Jump to content

Talk:Jefferson Davis

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Featured articleJefferson Davis is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.
Main Page trophyThis article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on June 3, 2014.
On this day... Article milestones
DateProcessResult
May 11, 2006Featured article candidateNot promoted
June 12, 2013Good article nomineeNot listed
July 28, 2013Good article nomineeNot listed
August 16, 2013Good article nomineeListed
September 26, 2013Peer reviewReviewed
November 3, 2013Featured article candidatePromoted
October 28, 2023Featured article reviewKept
On this day... Facts from this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on February 18, 2005, February 18, 2006, February 18, 2007, February 18, 2008, February 9, 2013, February 9, 2015, February 9, 2018, and February 9, 2024.
Current status: Featured article

Inconsistency

[edit]

From this article: "When Lincoln was assassinated on April 14, the Union government implicated Davis, and a bounty of $100,000 (equivalent to $3,600,000 in 2023) was put on his head." Also from this article: "After two years of imprisonment, Davis was released at Richmond on May 13, 1867, on bail of $100,000 (~$1.79 million in 2023)"

My quick search shows $100,000 in 1965 would be about $1.9 million today (2024). So the 3,600,000 number seems to be the one needing correcting. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.47.251.0 (talk) 07:07, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Done There was a typo in the conversion template. The two numbers still won't match up, as one is for 1865 dollars and one for 1867 dollars, but the difference is much smaller. Wtfiv (talk) 03:50, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]



Semi-protected edit request on 18 April 2024

[edit]

change "and an argument for the righteousness of succession" to "and an argument for the righteousness of secession." LitigiousOx (talk) 23:20, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

allegiance

[edit]

It disturbs me greatly that under “Allegiance” it says “United States”, that is BS. He was sworn and leader of the Confederacy AGAINST the US. He fought the Union. He was pro-slavery. 2601:602:400:FEC0:4D96:7E34:AEC1:81C7 (talk) 03:58, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"He fought the Union. He was pro-slavery." So were several of the Union states, the so-called border states (Delaware, Maryland, Kentucky, Missouri, and West Virginia). And Davis served the United States in the Black Hawk War and the Mexican-American War. Dimadick (talk) 05:35, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Treason

[edit]

@LesbianTiamat We cannot state that Davis committed treason in wiki-voice because he was never convicted of the crime. We are not allowed to make claims of fact based on our interpretation of events, laws etc. See WP:SYNTH. The most that can be done is to note that some sources have labeled his actions as treasonous with appropriate citations. -Ad Orientem (talk) 14:50, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That's total nonsense. Does the sun revolve around the Earth because Galileo was convicted? Get real.
I'll get some sources to cite him as a traitor in actual fact, despite him not being convicted ~150 years ago. LesbianTiamat (talk) 16:44, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@LesbianTiamat No, it's not nonsense. It's how we operate. We don't get to convict people of crimes no matter how strongly we may feel they are guilty. To state as a matter of fact that he was guilty of treason, a defined criminal act, he would have had to been convicted of that crime. Again, the most that can be done is to note that some persons/entities have described his actions as treasonous. As for Galileo, please see WP:NOTTRUTH. You are not required to agree with all of our policies and guidelines. There are some that I disagree with quite strongly. But we are not free to ignore them. In short; "themz the rules, until they aren't." -Ad Orientem (talk) 16:59, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
We actually are free to ignore them. There is no policy or guideline more important than WP:IGNORE. See WP:COMMONSENSE. LesbianTiamat (talk) 17:19, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
If you wish to make a WP:IAR argument that Wikipedia should hold Davis guilty of treason, you are free to open a discussion or WP:RfC and make your case. Speaking as an experienced editor I don't think that would fly. But introducing such claims, absent a very strong consensus, would IMO be disruptive. I would point out that when Fidel Castro died the community had a massive discussion over whether or not we could call him a dictator in wiki-voice. There were scores of reliable sources that had used that term in reference to Castro, in addition to commonsense. But the community said we could not do so because he was not universally described as such. -Ad Orientem (talk) 17:21, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]