Jump to content

User talk:Nick Graves

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from User talk:Rohirok)

Pluaral form of moose

[edit]

We see people adding the incorrect term "meese [1] from time to time but it is usually done by IP or vandal accounts, not established users. This has led me to wonder where this is coming from. So, of you don't mind my asking, where did you get the idea that "meese" was the proper pluaral form of "moose"? If there is some other website out there spreading misinformation it would be good to know that. Beeblebrox (talk) 18:19, 5 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The mistake was mine alone. I apologize, and thanks for checking. Nick Graves (talk) 19:25, 12 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and thanks for tagging this for notability. The tag's still there 5 years later; you could take it to the Notability Noticeboard or AfD, or remove the tag if you are no longer concerned. Best wishes, Boleyn (talk) 21:46, 24 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Questions on the "List of atheists in science and technology" inclusion discussion

[edit]

Dear Nick Graves, since you are the #1 contributor (according to wiki statistics) on the "List of atheists" article, is it possible to take part in the discussion of this article: Talk:List of atheists in science and technology? There is a Wikipedia user named "Pgarret" who is removing some well documented people (like Alan Turing and Steve Wozniak) from this list because he/she is commenting that Wikipedia's policy states that scientists must labeled themselves as atheists. "Pgarret" is also removing atheists who had said some nice things about religion (which I don't understand). If we were to take this guideline in a strict fashion, even Richard Dawkins would not be included in the list since he also called himself an agnostic as well. Source: Richard Dawkins: I can't be sure God does not exist. If you don't want to take part in the talk-page, could find and contact other administrators to take part in this issue? If not, could you please tell me how to alert other wikpedian users/administrators into this debate? I would appreciate it. Ninmacer20 (talk) 19:27, 9 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Michael Schmidt-Salomon

[edit]

Hi Nick,

are you interested in translating the new sections of de:Michael Schmidt-Salomon into English?

Greetings, --Merkið (talk) 18:03, 13 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Frigging listed at Redirects for discussion

[edit]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Frigging. Since you had some involvement with the Frigging redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 05:05, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:54, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:31, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Big Daddy Kaine listed at Redirects for discussion

[edit]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Big Daddy Kaine. Since you had some involvement with the Big Daddy Kaine redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. BDD (talk) 19:26, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Lists of nontheists listed at Redirects for discussion

[edit]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Lists of nontheists. Since you had some involvement with the Lists of nontheists redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 17:48, 12 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

"Frigging" listed at Redirects for discussion

[edit]

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Frigging and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 July 20#Frigging until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Steel1943 (talk) 23:54, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]