Talk:GrabIt
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
|
From VfD
[edit]From VfD:
Non-notable newsreader. [[User:Poccil|Peter O. (Talk)]] 18:54, Aug 14, 2004 (UTC)
- No vote. Gets a fair number of google hits and seems to be specialized in downloading images and things from usenet. The article as is might not do it justice. --Ianb 20:14, 14 Aug 2004 (UTC)
- Keep & send to clean up: Fairly notable and widely used program, but the article as it stands is like a press clip or a download description. Geogre 00:00, 15 Aug 2004 (UTC)
end moved discussion
Fair use rationale for Image:Grabitlogo.png
[edit]Image:Grabitlogo.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 23:35, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:Grabitmain.png
[edit]Image:Grabitmain.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 23:36, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
No response to emails? Not true ! Sure a few days delay but Ilan personally responds in a very friendly and helpful manner G.Harris —Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.16.151.17 (talk) 20:46, 20 November 2009 (UTC)
Nothing wrong with this article
[edit]There's nothing wrong with this article other than it isn't footnoted, but how many refs to news clients are there aside from those on NSP websites where this program has been recommended for years. Don't let the beta designation fool you. There is a new 2 beta in the works, btw. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.191.250.134 (talk) 01:59, 29 March 2012 (UTC)