Talk:Railtrack

A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the On this day section on October 17, 2017, October 17, 2020, and October 17, 2023.

London Low‑importance

	London portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Trains: in UK / in Scotland B‑class Low‑importance

Trains Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

B

This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by WikiProject UK Railways (assessed as High-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Transport in Scotland (assessed as High-importance).

Untitled

How do you edit the list of references? Reference 3 is for the Ladgrove Grove crash – should read 'Ladbroke'. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.188.130.2 (talk) 17:15, 2 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Corrected Dormskirk (talk) 19:17, 2 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

" it has been owned by non-profit organisation Network Rail. " -- AFAIK, that's the network that is now owned. Railtrack plc is now in liquidation. -- Tarquin

I wasn't sure on this issue, but I got the idea that Railtrack plc was sold to Network Rail and absorbed by it, while RT Group plc (ex Railtrack Group plc) is in liquidation. I'm open to better info, though. --rbrwr

This is the case. One point -- the article keeps saying Railtrack was put in liquidation, this was never true until RT Group plc was put in Members Liquidation in December 2002 - Railtrack plc was in "Railway Administration", which is a completely different legal animal. Arwel 20:14 Feb 27, 2003 (UTC)

Thanks for setting the record straight, Arwel. --rbrwr

Oh, and just to complicate things that little bit more, Railtrack plc has now (since February 3) apparently become Network Rail Infrastructure Ltd. [1] --rbrwr

Fair use rationale for Image:Rtgroup.gif

Image:Rtgroup.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 07:12, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fate of Railtrack

The fate of Railtrack was decided by the government in 2001, when it refused to put anymore money into the company after as series of accidents as well as a failure to meet project deadlines. user:Pdiddyjr has added a line to the Fate section which a) does not need to be there b) appears to be in breech of Wikipedia:Neutral point of view c) has no source to attached to the edit to verify his claim in the edit comments I have therefore removed his edit. LongRobin79(talk) 19:41, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Railtrack. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20120716192203/http://www.rtgroup.co.uk/ to http://www.rtgroup.co.uk/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers. —^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 12:37, 27 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Railtrack. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:54, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

railtrack

as fair as im aware there is partial sighs or railtrack at RHTS the signal box the track stamps the gates the bogies and much more. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chromebook098765432 (talk • contribs) 11:53, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]