Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Types of waves
The result of the debate was delete [added by Andre🚐 22:40, 15 August 2022 (UTC) for afdstats]
Orphan, single-sentence substub giving a rather dubious definition. The article might grow beyond that, but I somehow doubt it -- Ferkelparade π 10:18, 18 Oct 2004 (UTC)
- Delete. No sense redirecting to wave and no useful content to merge. Andrewa 12:19, 18 Oct 2004 (UTC)
- Keep, a lot of things come in waves. --Pgreenfinch 12:43, 18 Oct 2004 (UTC)
- Delete. The article on wave itself covers the detailed info on types of waves. --*drew 12:49, 18 Oct 2004 (UTC)
- Delete: Duplicated topic, but inferior and unlikely to be sought. Geogre 12:52, 18 Oct 2004 (UTC)
- Delete. Useless substub. Should be written in wave anyway. Nadavspi 00:25, 19 Oct 2004 (UTC)
- Delete. Gobbledegook. Andre (talk) 14:10, Oct 19, 2004 (UTC)
- Useless substub. Delete. - Mike Rosoft 12:32, 22 Oct 2004 (UTC)
- Del. This would belong in Wave, if it were fleshed out to the point of having any information content. --Jerzy(t) 14:36, 2004 Oct 22 (UTC)
- Delete, no redirect. Any curious person would look under wave. Fishal 06:40, 23 Oct 2004 (UTC)