Talk:List of named passenger trains of the United States (I–M)

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Trains: Passenger trains Mid‑importance

Trains Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by the Passenger trains task force.

This article lacks sufficient references and/or adequate inline citations.

Chicago links

I've rolled back the change because all of the other city specifications on the page are in the form "City, ST", even when it should be fairly clear what city is discussed. Both Chicago and Chicago, IL redirect to Chicago, Illinois, so this makes all the city specifications consistent here. slambo 14:11, Apr 19, 2005 (UTC)

Now Chicago is the article's location. Slambo (Speak) 03:54, 11 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Tag for Reference Sources

This list of passenger train names was tagged in February 2009 as not not citing sufficient references or sources. I believe this tagging is without merit. This page is a merely a list of names; sources and references would more properly be found on pages of the individual name trains.RI-Bill (talk) 03:53, 16 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yes and no; I think having a reference for the red-links would be a good idea. I've found that the years of operation for those are unreliable. Mackensen (talk) 21:29, 16 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]