Jump to content

Talk:Stacie Orrico

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Labels

[edit]

"She lost her label ForeFront Records in 2005 after 7 years"

Previous paragraph says she changed from ForeFront to Virgin after her first alblum - first paragraph says it was released in 2000.

This whole section seems to have a lot of original work. 75.88.23.101 (talk) 15:19, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Tracklist

[edit]
  1. I'm Not Missing You 1st single
  2. Somewhere We All Goes To
  3. Dream You
  4. Tantrum
  5. Last Day Of My Life
  6. Turn The Radio On
  7. Intuition
  8. There Goes My Prayer
  • more songs to be confirmed, also all those are reported on BMI and others.

Information

[edit]
  • "Hollow" has been confirmed on some Djs websites, also Junior Vasquez, Ralphi Rosario, Chris Cox and Jason Nevins are remixing this song for it's future release, is known that the single will be backed with "Tantrum".
  1. Hollow
  2. Hollow (Junior's World Anthem) /to be Stacie's first major club remix/
  3. Hollow (Ralphi Rosario Reduction Vocal)
  4. Hollow (Jason Nevins MixShow)
  5. Tantrum

Increasingly Secular?

[edit]

I cannot help but wonder that the tone of ms. orrico's albums is leaning more and more secular in light of her recent number ones "Stuck" and "(theres got to be) more to life" compared to her music of her earlier albums. Am I the only one with this impression?--Kenn Caesius 18:49, 22 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You're right, but it does not matter. She does not like the term "Christian artist" anyway. Later!!!--Chili14 03:45, 10 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
If there isn't a source that says she is a "Contemporary Christian" artist, then that should be removed from the first paragraph. 75.88.23.101 (talk) 15:19, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

someone to watch the page?

[edit]

I will remove "She is one Ugly Bitch who deserves shooting. The mole on her face is vile" from her page, but would someone watch it from further vandalism?

just ignore the mole...it counts nothing to her good voice and art. She still looks good anyway-wholesome beauty, I must stay.

family information

[edit]

Something about her siblings is wrong though I'm not sure what...she has a younger sister who goes to my school, but her younger sister does not have a twin brother. So either the article is missing mention of another sister, or the information about a twin brother is wrong.

Question

[edit]

Did she break her arm during the shoot of the video for (There gotta be) More to life? I remember once seeing a "behind the scenes" video on the mtv site which showed her with an arm in a cast. I'm not sure if it is still up. --Athcnv 19:11, 12 January 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Stacieorrico-sayitagain.jpg

[edit]

Image:Stacieorrico-sayitagain.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 07:43, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Stacieorrico-forchristmassingle.jpg

[edit]

Image:Stacieorrico-forchristmassingle.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 07:43, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:StacieBounceBack.jpg

[edit]

Image:StacieBounceBack.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 07:43, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

discography

[edit]

i created Stacie Orrico discography yesterday. Stacie's Orrico discography should be seperate right???
Nemo24 (talk) 17:15, 19 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Stacie Orrico photo

[edit]

Is it possible to upload a photo of Stacie for her Wikipedia page? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.174.16.238 (talk) 00:34, 25 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Grammar

[edit]

I tried to do some rewording, but I can't understand what is being said in the last part of her music career from 2002-04. Can anyone reword it or find the source of that information? Zvyx (talk) 13:10, 23 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Stacie Orrico. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers. —cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 05:50, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Stacie Orrico. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 13:40, 6 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Stacie Orrico. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:59, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]