Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/There is no spoon
Appearance
was proposed for deletion. This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was DELETE
Not worthy of its own page. The Matrix article already has a link to a page on Wikiquote with many Matrix quotes including this one. --Chessphoon 02:22, 15 Sep 2004 (UTC)
- Delete; agree on all points. Kbh3rd 02:39, 15 Sep 2004 (UTC)
- Delete. --Yath 06:01, 15 Sep 2004 (UTC)
- Clearly, here "there is no article". Dictdef. Redirect to The Matrix. --Slowking Man 06:45, Sep 15, 2004 (UTC)
- Why not just redirect this to The Matrix article? Redirects are cheap, and discourage re-creation of the article. -- Netoholic @ 06:45, 2004 Sep 15 (UTC)
- Delete: I don't see people searching this. It's not much of a quote, either; about the most obvious Zen borrowing in the film. Geogre 13:25, 15 Sep 2004 (UTC)
- This phrase has entered popular culture, or at least is common in some circles. There is an article on All your base are belong to us, so why not this? Obviously, it needs expansion, but I think it can stand. Keep. Darksun 17:50, 15 Sep 2004 (UTC)
- Delete. I don't know if phrases ever belong in Wikipedia unless they have some kind of legal meaning or similar, but if they do, they need to meet a higher standard. --Improv 20:03, 15 Sep 2004 (UTC)
- Redirect. That will discourage someone else from coming along later and remaking it unless they have enough material to add. --[[User:Aranel|Aranel ("Sarah")]] 00:01, 16 Sep 2004 (UTC)
- Whoah. Delete. Lacrimosus 02:05, 16 Sep 2004 (UTC)
- Delete. Perhaps Wikiquote, but I expect it's there already. Andrewa 07:18, 16 Sep 2004 (UTC)
- You mean, I can vote to Delete articles? --Lysol 14:36, Sep 16, 2004 (UTC)
- Don't try to delete the article. That's impossible. Just try to realize that there is no article.
- Redirect to The Matrix to prevent recreation and impress newbies with Wikipedia's powers. -- Cyrius|✎ 06:30, 17 Sep 2004 (UTC)
- Redirect... as long as the original one is deleted first. - Cymydog Naakka 10:22, 17 Sep 2004 (UTC)
- May I ask what damage the (sub)substub will do in the page history? Are you concerned with the wasted server space? Redirect. — David Remahl 10:33, 19 Sep 2004 (UTC)
- Delete. [[User:Neutrality|Neutrality (talk)]] 04:16, Sep 20, 2004 (UTC)
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like other '/delete' pages is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion or on the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.