This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was speedy delete. [1] —Korath (Talk) 03:27, Apr 15, 2005 (UTC)
Not encyclopedic. Possibly vanity? Delete. --Plainsong 06:32, 9 Apr 2005 (UTC)
I'd say speedy delete, in my opinion it's patent nonsense. Unless I'm missing something, of course. Sholtar 06:35, Apr 9, 2005 (UTC)
Not that I can see. :^) Speedy delete. This guy's been warned before. - Lucky 6.9 07:06, 9 Apr 2005 (UTC)