User talk:Oneliner

New comments at the very bottom please

reference:

Wilhelm Imaging Research

Look, I'm not affiliated with them in any way, and don't appreciate you saying so on the page. Also, this is not a valid candidate for speedy deletion. If you don't think it's notable, then please place it on WP:VFD. Thanks. - Ta bu shi da yu 02:15, 26 Nov 2004 (UTC)

Do you accept that my article is notable now?! - Ta bu shi da yu 02:43, 30 Nov 2004 (UTC)

No damage done! :-) I've had to retreat a few times on VfD too... it should be cool to keep it on there for a while. Someone will remove it. Incidently, I agree the stub is crap. I just put something in that tried to very briefly describe the company, plus a link. I might list on cleanup. - Ta bu shi da yu 11:06, 30 Nov 2004 (UTC)

Jiri Cerovsky

I quite agree with you on low notability of articles regional Czech politicians on English Wiki. All experience I have says they cannot be maintained properly. If you put it on VFD I'll support it. Pavel Vozenilek 18:03, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Israeli terrorism

I fail to see how a random amnesty international report bears any relation to the issue. Amnesty is also an incredibly biased source as a glance at their previous record on the conflict will show. So actually, the removal of their link is improving the NPOV, rather than violating it.

What do you think about deleting this article and merging it with state terrorism?

Guy Montag 07:41, 14 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Thank you for your support

Thank you for supporting my candidacy for administrator. Kelly Martin 15:13, Jun 10, 2005 (UTC)

Talk: Kidron

Hello Cryptic, thank you for your quick action with Talk:Kidron. Unfortunately, there still remains some bad linking/or error? in the database. If you go to Talk:Kidron and the press "Article" button, you will again get falsely redirected to the Kidron Valley, as if the disamb page was somehow corrupted. If replying, use my talk page pls. --Oneliner 16:32, 29 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No database error or anything like that; when a page gets moved, it leaves behind a redirect so people can find it. I've deleted Talk:Kidron, since it's no longer relevant to Kidron since it's turned into a disambig. —Cryptic 16:37, 29 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, now it's perfect. --Oneliner 16:41, 29 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Notification: changes to "Mark my edits as minor by default" preference

Hello there. This is an automated message to tell you about the gradual phasing out of the preference entitled "Mark all edits minor by default", which you currently have (or very recently had) enabled.

On 13 March 2011, this preference was hidden from the user preferences screen as part of efforts to prevent its accidental misuse (consensus discussion). This had the effect of locking users in to their existing preference, which, in your case, was true. To complete the process, your preference will automatically be changed to false in the next few days. This does not require any intervention on your part and you will still be able to manually mark your edits as being 'minor'. The only thing that's changed is that you will no longer have them marked as minor by default.

For established users such as yourself there is a workaround available involving custom JavaScript. If you are familiar with the contents of WP:MINOR, and believe that it is still beneficial to the encyclopedia to have all your edits marked as such by default, then this discussion will give you the details you need to continue with this functionality indefinitely. If you have any problems, feel free to drop me a note.

Thank you for your understanding and happy editing :) Editing on behalf of User:Jarry1250, LivingBot (talk) 18:45, 14 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:53, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Oneliner. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]