Talk:Devils Postpile National Monument

Volcanoes Low‑importance

	Volcanoes portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Volcanoes, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of volcanoes, volcanology, igneous petrology, and related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.VolcanoesWikipedia:WikiProject VolcanoesTemplate:WikiProject VolcanoesWikiProject Volcanoes articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

California Low‑importance

	California portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Protected areas Low‑importance

	This article is part of WikiProject Protected areas, a WikiProject related to national parks and other protected natural or ecological areas worldwide.Protected areasWikipedia:WikiProject Protected areasTemplate:WikiProject Protected areasProtected areas articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Apostrophe

Does anybody have any idea why there's no apostrophe in the monument's name? I thought that was wrong till I went to the official site and, yes, there's no apostrophe. RickK 04:55, 25 Feb 2004 (UTC)

As I understand it, in many countries, apostrophes are deprecated on topographic maps. See, e.g., [1][2][3]. The reasons for this are obscure. So, many geographical features that you think should have an apostrophe actually don't. Since the NM was named after the geological feature, it inherited the lack of apostrophe. -- hike395 06:51, 25 Feb 2004 (UTC)

The gov.au reference above seems to be incorrect. See [4], which seems to make the reason clear: "The reason is simply that the GNC does not want to show possession for natural features because 'ownership of a feature is not in and of itself a reason to name a feature or change its name.' " Similarly, the USGS states that "We suspect that the reason is simply that the U.S. Board on Geographic Names does not want to show possession for natural features because 'ownership of a feature is not in and of itself a reason to name a feature or change its name.' " Jim 05:25, 26 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Devils Postpile National Monument. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100527174149/http://www.nature.nps.gov/geology/usgsnps/depo/dpgeol5.html to http://www2.nature.nps.gov/geology/usgsnps/depo/dpgeol5.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:03, 23 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]