Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daniel Holt
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was pending deletion. ugen64 23:51, 22 Mar 2005 (UTC)
delete, Vanity Page?--Lloydd 05:38, 10 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Delete, not a notable stub. Tygar 07:33, Mar 10, 2005 (UTC)
- Delete, just under the bar of notability, possible vanity. Megan1967 07:34, 10 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. Assistant on two minor independent films - keeping this would be the equivalent of listing all PhD students. Average Earthman 10:26, 10 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Keep. --Ryan! | Talk 19:49, Mar 10, 2005 (UTC)
- Why? What in this article is the slightest bit encyclopedic? Gamaliel 21:09, 10 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. Only slightly less notable would be an article saying "Daniel Holt bought four things at the supermarket today: Oreos, 2% Milk, cat food, and trash bags." Really, there's nothing notable here. Vanity or equivalent. -R. fiend 21:04, 10 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. Probably vanity and self-promotion. Not encyclopedic in any case. Gamaliel 21:09, 10 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Someone might want to take a look at the director this guy worked with, Gavin Heffernan. Seems like vanity too. Made two movies, each shot on video and both only shown at a handful of festivals, as far as I can tell. Seems they haven't had distribution or DVD release. -R. fiend 21:12, 10 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Delete, vanity ad. Wyss 01:14, 11 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Delete both as vanity. I wonder what Heffernan's shopping list looks like...? - Lucky 6.9 01:28, 11 Mar 2005 (UTC)
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.