Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Steve Bennett
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was - stubbed and kept - SimonP 02:54, May 18, 2005 (UTC)
The article is simply an unverifiable personal attack against the man.
Alereon 09:20, 11 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to the Starchaser page, or make this page an objective biography. Darksun 11:29, 11 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Amend to make an objective biography seems more useful User:DavidFarmbrough 13:48 (BST) 11 May 2005
- Amend. This is a reasonably important guy. We're getting way too many VfDs about content quality. The VfD process is about whether a subject deserves wikipedia space, not issues of fact or objectivity. If you don't like the factual quality of an article, you can rewrite it, stubify it, or just just slap a Dispute or Maintenance template on it. ---Isaac R 18:07, 11 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete personal attack page with no encyclopedic content except his Starchaser role. Recreate as just a redirect to Starchaser, unless verifiable information about the individual (apart from the company) can be gathered for a proper bio and can show notability. Not all of the thousands of companies, projects, etc. notable enough for WP articles confer such notability on their founders or bosses. Bill Gates, yes; Steve Bennett, not unless much more can be shown. Barno 18:13, 11 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Disambiguate the Steve Bennett linked to from CPU cache#Trace cache if anything stays. Samaritan 19:07, 11 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.