Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arbiter of Succession

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was Merge and redirect to Klingon. Deathphoenix 02:11, 12 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Arbiter of Succession

This article spent more than 24 hours tagged for Speedy Deletion without any admin finding a case for it, or removing the tag as obviously inappropriate. I have replaced the Speedy tag with a VfD tag and am listing it accordingly. No vote. SWAdair | Talk 10:52, 25 Feb 2005 (UTC)

• Delete. Insignificant piece of Star Trek trivia. jni 11:35, 25 Feb 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. For the same reason. Note, however, that there's a stomach turning amount of star trek trivia in the wikipedia that could be similarly deleted or merged or whatever. Avriette 12:09, 25 Feb 2005 (UTC)
• Merge or keep Star Trek stuff. Kappa 12:46, 25 Feb 2005 (UTC)
• Delete or at best compress down to a sentence or two and stick in with Klingon Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 14:54, Feb 25, 2005 (UTC)
• Merge into an article on the relevant episode. - SimonP 14:58, Feb 25, 2005 (UTC)
• Since the article for the episode doesn't currently exist, maybe Move it to Reunion (Star Trek) (that's the title List of Star Trek: TNG episodes is looking for) and tweak it so it's a start of the episode article, as that ep is the only time the 'Arbiter of Succession' is a major factor in Trek canon (the events of "Reunion" play a smaller role in the later ep "Redemption (Star Trek)", which already has an article)? Otherwise, de-link from Klingon and Delete, or merge/redir into Klingon. Niteowlneils 18:47, 25 Feb 2005 (UTC)
• Merge into Klingon. Kbdank71 19:32, 25 Feb 2005 (UTC)
• Comment. What about all the other separate articles listed in Category:Star_Trek_politics? Should we merge each one into its relevant episode? Or combine them into one "Star Trek politics" article? Zzyzx11 20:45, 25 Feb 2005 (UTC)
  • In response to ZZyzx11, my answer is yes, if it's a minor or one-time reference such as Arbiter of succession. In the case of this article, merge with Klingon. 23skidoo 21:49, 25 Feb 2005 (UTC)
• either Keep or merge to Klingon. Megan1967 23:18, 25 Feb 2005 (UTC)
• Merge into Klingon, Star Trek politics, or other suitable article. The Arbiter of Succession is a notable term in Star Trek but does not merit an article all to itself. — JIP | Talk 17:11, 26 Feb 2005 (UTC)
• Merge. Andrew pmk 04:13, 27 Feb 2005 (UTC)
• Merge to Klingon High Council rather than Klingon, since the subject's already mentioned there. Gazpacho 12:33, 2 Mar 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.