User talk:Cafzal
Abit late, but still:
Welcome!
Hello, Cafzal, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}}
on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Ian¹³/t 09:01, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
- Thanks for welcoming me, Ian! I have been here a while but it is only now that I have picked up my activity here. --clearthought 13:11, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for the welcome
[edit]Thanks for the welcome! Pressure Thirteen 01:42, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
- You're welcome. I hope you enjoy your time editing here on Wikipedia! ~ clearthought 04:09, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
Figo page
[edit]Hi there, not sure why you put back the duplicated information on the Figo page. A lot of the article is repeated and this was my first bash at removing one of the most obvious duplications. It is generally in a bit of a mess. --Bcnviajero 19:42, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
- When I put some of the information back, I could not find where it was duplicated. Yes, that article needs cleanup, but I could not find the duplicated information that warranted the taking out of that large of a chunk of that article. ~ clearthought 22:12, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
Hey -- I'm sure just a misunderstanding, but please realize that {{db-bio}} doesn't apply to companies. It's meant for individual people or small groups of them (like musical groups), not corporations. Also, even if db-bio did apply to this type of article, it wouldn't apply in this case, because the article explains the subject's importance. Things that are non-notable can be deleted, but not through speedy deletion. May I suggest you use WP:PROD? It'll probably go through with no problems. Mangojuicetalk 18:21, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
- Thank you very much for letting me know that. I am new to these deletion protocols. ~ clearthought 18:23, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
List of places beyond Bikini Bottom
[edit]I just wanted to tell that saying something like this article is not importance is not a reason for it to be speedied deleted. As such, I've listed it for deletion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of places beyond Bikini Bottom if you'd like to add your opinion. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 19:54, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
- OK. Thanks for letting me know. ~ clearthought 20:29, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
- No problem. Any other questions, just ask. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 04:39, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
Irish American
[edit]can you please stop adding in POV rhetoric...the irish page was fine until you changed it to have a pure ulster scots feel...this is an irish american page...it is talking about those who are irish american and those who chose irish american...as per the last census 34million chose IRISH and only 4.9 million chose SCOTCH-IRISH....irish catholic immigration has been far larger in numbers than scotch-irish...most of the millions of irish who came into americn during the mid 19th century to the 20th century were overwhelmingly irish catholic...the census asks people to choose their ethnicity and they did...thus there is no need for u to makeup numbers and choose it for them...i love how who just came up with a figure of 23-30 million are of scotch irish descent...if u truly believe that then right it up on the scotch irish page and leave the irish american page alone..i am just getting tired of changing it after putting in so much hard work into it... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.33.142.34 (talk • contribs)
- You stop adding your rhetoric to the mix. That information has every right to be in that article. Please also sign your comments. ~ clearthought 20:22, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
- You say: if u truly believe that then right it up on the scotch irish page and leave the irish american page alone. If you believe that to be the case, then why are you removing the same information from the Scotch-Irish page as well [1]? IrishGuy talk 20:36, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
My rhetoric...
[edit]ha...with all due respect...that information has no sources...it is pure made up garbage...there are not 23-30 million scotch irish...yes they were fundamentally important to colonial america but in all actuality they were small as far an immigrant groups..roughly 250, 000 came over before massive Irish Catholic immigration...most Irish immigrants to America came after 1840 and most were Catholic...so based on that it only makes sense for their to be more Americans to choose Irish as compared to Scotch-Irish....also where do you get off saying that all Irish Americans want a united Ireland..that is such a bold statement...did u ask each and every irish american...i think not....the reason u have the scotch irish term is because the protestant irish did not want to be compared to the poor gaelic speaking catholic irish who were immigrating into american by the millions from the 1840s to well into the 1900s...so your reasoning behind the origin of the term is pure rubbish...start reading some wider sources of information and enter scholarly facts —Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.33.142.34 (talk • contribs)
- First you say that the content belongs with Ulster-Scots, and then when it is shown that you removed it from even there you change gears. As I told you every other time you have shown up ranting, the content you dispute was added by 85.1.55.41. Not by me. Not by Cafzal. Read WP:CIV and WP:ATTACK before you continue with your hostile behavior. If you want to have a dialogue, we will do that. If you want to keep leaving unsigned rants all over Wikipedia, that isn't going to work. IrishGuy talk 22:03, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
- What you are saying is rubbish, pal. In addition please sign your comments: ~~~~. There is census and other data on the topic of which you speak. In addition why did you remove it, as IrishGuy said, from the Ulster-Scots article too? ~ clearthought 23:21, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
Your edit to User talk:Willywonka3505
[edit]When using template tags on talk pages, don't forget to substitute with text by adding subst: to the template tag. For example, use {{subst:test}} instead of {{test}}. This reduces server load and prevents accidental blanking of the template. - CobaltBlueTony 15:19, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
- OK. Thanks for letting me know. ~ clearthought 15:24, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
The UN Page
[edit]Thank you, im kinda new so its nice to feel appreciate. The article is just so messy...~ Jcdams 15:59, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
[edit]SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot 03:39, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
August Esperanza Newsletter
[edit]
|
|
|
Date links
[edit]Please don't make edits like this. Per our guidelines, full dates which include a month and a day should be Wikilinked (including the year), while standalone years should not be Wikilinked. You unlinked a valid full date and then linked a standalone year, which is the opposite of what should be done. --Cyde Weys 14:57, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
- Oh, I did not know that. Thanks for passing on the info! ~ clearthought 15:39, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
Re:Piping
[edit]Hi Cafzal/Clearthought - Piping is adding a vertical bar and some indexing information within a template or category. Only a very small number of templates allow this - and none of the stub ones do - it's mainly used for categories. Your previous edit was to add {{england-geo-stub}}, which wouldn't have done anything that {{england-geo-stub}} wouldn't have done. In any case, Witton Lakes is automatically be indexed under Witton, since it's at the beginning of the article title, so piping was doubly unnecessary in this case. Grutness...wha? 23:38, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
- Alright. Thanks for explaining that to me. ~ clearthought 23:54, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
Enlighter1 socks
[edit]Thanks for helping fight the vandalism of this really annoying user and his sockpuppets. Much appreciated. Thistheman 02:02, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
- You're welcome. I only fight serious vandals, and work mostly on editing and contributing to Wikipedia. Thanks also to people like you for your hard work! ~ clearthought 02:04, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
Reply about 2006 ILC
[edit]Just in case, I've replied on my talk page. CP/M comm |Wikipedia Neutrality Project| 18:57, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
Lead
[edit]I replaced the heavy lead with the previous consensus version because those sources are for the most part repeated elsewhere, and don't to help the WP:Lead, which is supposed to be an extremely concise summary of the article. Additionally, consensus has also held that they be removed in the interests of size. And of course, the current structuring contains disputed assertions. Let me know if you have any qyestions. Cheers, TewfikTalk 20:05, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
- I am not against a concise lead, but I don't like it when good references and good summary information is removed. In addition, some of your edits changed some of the wording even though it needed no changing (in my opinion). There are some people -- and I don't mean you -- who feel the need to push their agenda, and the ILC page is falling pray to some of those people. I just want an informative, objective article that follows both proper writing and Wikipedia styles. ~ clearthought 20:10, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
Edits
[edit]The 8 to eight isn't the issue. The problem was that each <ref> tag is its own unit, so the "publisher" or any entry must be wikified each and every separate time so that the <references /> section populates properly. Thanks. -- Avi 21:35, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
- Oh... so if there are, let's say, three BBC News sources in a section, they would all have "BBC News" wikilinked? Or if two news stories had the same date, both would be linked? If that's what you mean then I understand, thanks for clearing that up. I will go back over the article and fix that all back up. ~ clearthought 21:48, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
- Yes, because each reference populates itself independently of any other ref. Now, if each entry was referring to the SAME reference (same url for example) then there should only be ONE primary entry with a name such as <ref name = "foo">{{cite web
|blah =
|blah =
}}</ref> and every other time THAT particular URL/source gets mentioned, you'd just have to type <ref name = "foo" /> -- Avi 22:02, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
- OK; I get it. Thanks again. ~ clearthought 22:05, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
- Yes, because each reference populates itself independently of any other ref. Now, if each entry was referring to the SAME reference (same url for example) then there should only be ONE primary entry with a name such as <ref name = "foo">{{cite web
|blah =
|blah =
}}</ref> and every other time THAT particular URL/source gets mentioned, you'd just have to type <ref name = "foo" /> -- Avi 22:02, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
Thanks
[edit]...for the comment on my user page. I usually just get grief there! Elizmr 00:58, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
- No problem. I it nice to see some good editors out there, I am just envious that Mr. Jimbo Wales has edited your page ;-) ! ~ clearthought 02:37, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
If the Wikify tag is "not acceptable", then the article needs some kind of related tag. That article is a mess! Repeat links, choppy info, the works! ~ clearthought 18:01, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
- The tag you would be looking for is surely cleanup, but I don't think it makes sense to put that on an article about a current event, which is evolving rapidly at present. I suggest waiting for a while. Olborne 09:52, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
[edit]SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot 15:07, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
Signpost updated for September 5th.
[edit]
| ||
Volume 2, Issue 36 | 5 September 2006 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | RSS Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:17, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
Super-power
[edit]Stop your editing nonsense on the super power page. Your edits and inclusions of copyvio tag are lame, and totally unfounded. Why don't you create an article arguing Scotland is a superpower, and leave the other page alone? Or, improve the page like a normal person, without "OMG I'm just as good" POV garbage. ~~smooth_operator 18:14, 6 September 2006 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.248.222.23 (talk • contribs)
- Excuse me? I was just following Wikipedia procedure. We needed to confirm that GlobalCPR took that information from Wikipedia and that we did not take it from them. I am not the one being egotistical, and I am not an IP address pretending to be under a registered name and calling others obnoxious and self-centered, you are. There now has been a conclusion that GlobalCPR took the information from Wikipedia, but before the user that provided hard facts of that (by citing the Chevrolet article), it is best to assume that, because of the nature of copyvios, unless a site is a mirror (like answers.com) of Wikipedia, there is reason to suggest a copyvio. Wikipedia does NOT follow the arrogant opinion of ONE unregistered user. There is NOW a reached consensus on the matter of the copyvio, but please do not be renegade in your decisions to delete tags like the copyvio one in the future unless you can provide proof contrary to the tag. I put the tag up in the first place because it seemed like parts of our superpower article were copied from them, it is not unusual. Please do not launch unfounded personal attacks against me again. ~ clearthought 21:08, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
- You've got to be kidding me, personal attacks? I wasn't making personal attacks, don't flatter yourself. As far as me being an IP address goes, who cares? My "nic" is smooth_operator, many people know me by that name - google it. Just because I'm not registered, doesn't make my qualities any less substantial. As for your whining, hmmmmmmmmmmmm, turns out I was right...imagine that. Justify your actions all you want, you will anyways, point is, I noticed it wasn't copyvio ages ago...you didn't. Also, other people noticed it, why do you think NOBDODY ELSE added the copyvio? Btw, you said, "it is best to assume". Lets analyze that statement shall we? Oh, I see the word 'assume', a.k.a., POV! Assume without anyone elses consensus (which you also speak of). If you had done even the smallet amount of research, instead of sticking a copyvio tag on an article which even a monkey could do, you would have noticed what we all did...no copyvio! I even went as far as sending the webhost an e-mail...which confirmed the fact. Next time, think before you edit something, or, you might just stick with spell checking articles as your method contributions.
- Regards,
- smooth_operator, 20:50, 7 September 2006 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.248.222.23 (talk • contribs)
- I do recognize that you feel against my editorial actions, but I know that I was doing what I believed was right (see WP:BB). My actions are not for you or anyone else who only attacks me to critique. Furthermore, you have no right to 'explain' my 'faults' when you obviously have many to work out yourself. ~ clearthought 02:05, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
Please revert your last revert
[edit]As a show of good faith, we can work out the nitty gritty later. I would like to keep the dialog on the chart moving. Carbonate 14:08, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
Also, thank you for your support :) Carbonate 14:09, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
- I don't think that some of these pro-Israel IPs that, mind you, I was warding off last night, really care about a compromise. If they did, than they would have made some real dialogue by now. See Talk:2006 Israel-Lebanon conflict#Pie_chart and Talk:Casualties of the 2006 Israel-Lebanon conflict#Pie_chart for all previous discussion. And, you're welcome. ~ clearthought 14:13, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
- I agree, but I still think it's best to take the high road if it keeps that graph in place for a day or two. I just read CP/M's talk page, thank you for asking for assistance. I think CP/M made very constructive critisims and I hope I implemented them well. Carbonate 14:16, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
Signpost updated for September 11th.
[edit]
| ||
Volume 2, Issue 37 | 11 September 2006 | About the Signpost |
|
Carnildo resysopped | Report from the Hungarian Wikipedia |
News and notes | Features and admins |
Bugs, Repairs, and International Operational News | The Report on Lengthy Litigation |
| |
Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | RSS Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 05:47, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
A request for mediation has been filed with the Mediation Committee that lists you as a party. The Mediation Committee requires that all parties listed in a mediation must be notified of the mediation. Please review the request at Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/Casualties of the 2006 Israel-Lebanon conflict, and indicate whether you agree or refuse to mediate. If you are unfamiliar with mediation, please refer to Wikipedia:Mediation. There are only seven days for everyone to agree, so please check as soon as possible.
Carbonate 11:11, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
Signpost updated for September 18th.
[edit]
| ||
Volume 2, Issue 38 | 18 September 2006 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | RSS Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 05:48, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
September Esperanza Newsletter
[edit]
|
|
|
Harry potter 7
[edit]Hello Nice to see that some new faces have recently become interested in commenting on the article. However, I am interested to know how you became involved with the page? It would seem that someone came along and changed the title without any discussion. Then someone started a debate about a different title. A number of people I have never seen comment on a Harry Potter page then opposed the proposed further move. This is quite extraordinary attention for a HP page.
No one has yet explained the grounds for changing the page from its original title. Can you explain why this was done? It was also done by someone who had never edited the page before and was pretty inexperienced. A justification was given, but not explained. Then an anon deleted the debate. Also very strange. Why would anyone do this? Sounded like someone wanted to avoid discussion. While I do not think it likely that people would have opposed the page title change if it is satifactorily explained, this has still not been done. I do not see how any change of title can be discussed or considered unless someone explains why it needed to be moved in the first place. Sandpiper 07:55, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
- Hi.
- I would never delete a debate or other important info on a talk page; if you look at my edits you will see that I am not that kind of editor;
- I don't have the authority to move a page;
- I don't use anon sock-puppets;
- I rested my case in the aforementioned title debate (even after explaining my reasoning — it was just not worth it).
- ~ clearthought 20:08, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
Signpost updated for September 25th.
[edit]
| ||
Volume 2, Issue 39 | 25 September 2006 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | RSS Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 07:50, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
Signpost updated for October 2nd.
[edit]
| ||
Volume 2, Issue 40 | 2 October 2006 | About the Signpost |
|
New speedy deletion criteria added | News and notes |
Wikipedia in the news | Features and admins |
The Report on Lengthy Litigation |
| |
Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | RSS Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:23, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
Signpost updated for October 9th.
[edit]
| ||
Volume 2, Issue 41 | 9 October 2006 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 16:38, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
Chart
[edit]The request for mediation has failed. No compromise chart was presented so I have readded the one I created. Carbonate 08:01, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
- Fine with me. The opposers will just have to deal with it and stop trying to sensor the same information presented to them on the page. Thanks for your keeping calm and working on the chart. ~ clearthought 16:00, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
The Chart you try to push is clearly POV because 700 killed Hezbollah members confirmed by 3rd parties are not included.Shrike 22:06, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
- (In re to above comment and [2]) I welcome you to submit a legitimate reference/source to that claim... and not to have a one-person crusade on all things that do not paint Israel in a great light — though are just representing the figures known — and will cease trying to take on all the efforts of compromising I and others (namely CM/M and Carbonate) have made. ~ clearthought 22:39, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
If I submit this for arbitration, can I list you? Carbonate 03:57, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
Invitation
[edit]You're invited to join Wikipedians for Palestine "for Wikipedians working to combat anti-Palestinian and pro-Zionist bias in the English language version of Wikipedia."
Signpost updated for October 16th.
[edit]
| ||
Volume 2, Issue 42 | 16 October 2006 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 17:42, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
Signpost updated for October 23rd.
[edit]
| ||
Volume 2, Issue 43 | 23 October 2006 | About the Signpost |
|
Report from the Finnish Wikipedia | News and notes: Donation currencies added, milestones |
Wikipedia in the news | Features and admins |
The Report on Lengthy Litigation |
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:15, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
Signpost updated for October 30th.
[edit]
| ||
Volume 2, Issue 44 | 30 October 2006 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 05:30, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
You have mail
[edit]You have a reply waiting for you at Wikipedia:Esperanza/Admin coaching The Transhumanist 18:29, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
Esperanza Admin coaching - November 2 - Held requests
[edit]As it's been a while since you signed up for admin coaching, I am just checking that you still wish to receive it. Leave a note on my talk page, and I'll assign you some of our free coaches. Let me know (on my talk page) if you have any questions. Cheers, Highway Grammar Enforcer! 22:26, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
RfA
[edit]I have posted an RfA here Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration#Israeli_POV that lists you as an involved party. Carbonate 03:50, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
November Esperanza Newsletter
[edit]
|
|
|
Signpost updated for November 6th.
[edit]Weekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 2, Issue 45 | 6 November 2006 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 05:06, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
Signpost updated for November 13th.
[edit]Weekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 2, Issue 46 | 13 November 2006 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 05:00, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
Signpost updated for November 20th.
[edit]Weekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 2, Issue 47 | 20 November 2006 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:23, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
Signpost updated for November 27th.
[edit]Weekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 2, Issue 48 | 27 November 2006 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 01:29, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
PRODding felinology
[edit]Hello, I recently proposed felinology for deletion due to it being a neologism. If I am incorrect in this assertion, please add a reputable source that uses the word, and remove the prod. Thank you. :3 —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Pumeleon (talk • contribs) 03:02, 3 December 2006 (UTC).
Signpost updated for December 4th.
[edit]Weekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 2, Issue 49 | 4 December 2006 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 05:28, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
Signpost updated for December 11th.
[edit]Weekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 2, Issue 50 | 11 December 2006 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 04:51, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
Admin coaching, etc.
[edit]Are you ready to get started?
The waiting time over at Admin coaching is long (some people have been waiting in line since July). I'm an admin coach with the project, and for my students I set up a group discussion page so that we could all learn from each other. The scope of this concept has expanded into the Virtual classroom, which is an open forum for the teaching and learning of advanced Wikipedia skills.
Anyone and everyone is welcome to participate, as a student, as a coach, or both. Every week or two a new major topic of discussion or classroom assignment is introduced, usually with a guest writer who presents his or her expertise on the current subject and who remains on hand to answer questions. Everyone is encouraged to participate in the discussions, such as sharing your expertise, asking and answering questions, etc.
The current topic of discussion is vandalism, and our guest writer is Budgiekiller.
All discussions are open-ended, so all previous discussion topics and classroom assignments are still there for viewing and further participation. There are also sections for posting miscellaneous topics and questions, requesting coaching assistance, etc.
In addition to inviting those who would like to learn, I routinely invite experts from all over Wikipedia to come and contribute for the benefit of all. The VC is rapidly turning into a clearing house of the best resources, methods, and techniques known for working on Wikipedia.
You are cordially invited to participate.
Here's an announcement box which you can place on your userpage or at the top of your talk page for keeping up to date with classroom assignments.
I hope to see you there. Sincerely, The Transhumanist 08:34, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
Concordia is currently trying to relaunch. I, and all the members of the ex-council, wish to welcome new members to the group. We are a group who aim to promote remaining civil, in an environment where messages can easily be interpretated wrongly.
Help out now!
[edit]- Try and help people remain civil! Talk to them, and help them in any way possible. Do not be afraid to use the talk page.
- Give people the Civility Barnstar.
- Make and spread some Wikitokens so people know there are people to help if they want assistance.
- Add banners or logos to your userpage to show your support.
- Suggest some ideas! Add 'em to the talk page.
We are a community, so can only work though community contributions and support. It's the helping that counts.
Decision Making
[edit]The council expired one month ago, but due to the current position of the group the current council will remain until the position of the group can be assessed, and whether it would be sensible to keep Concordia going. For most decisions, however, it will be decided by all who choose to partake in discussions. I am trying to relaunch because of the vast amounts of new members we have received, demonstrating that the aims are supported.
If you wish to opt of of further talk-page communications, just let us know here.
- Ian¹³/t 20:29, 13 December 2006 (UTC). Kindly delivered by MiszaBot.
Signpost updated for December 18th.
[edit]Weekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 2, Issue 51 | 18 December 2006 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 05:58, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
Signpost updated for December 26th.
[edit]Weekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 2, Issue 52 | 26 December 2006 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 07:02, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
Admin Coaching
[edit]Hi Cafzal,
You indicated here you're interested in Admin Coaching, especially over the holidays. As I'm an admin coach, and my coachee has seemingly gone inactive, I figured I'd pick up the next name on the list, which is yours. :) Still interested? Firsfron of Ronchester 08:40, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
Signpost updated for January 2nd, 2007.
[edit]Weekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 3, Issue 1 | 2 January 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 07:11, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for January 8th, 2007.
[edit]Weekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 3, Issue 2 | 8 January 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:37, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for January 15th, 2007.
[edit]Weekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 3, Issue 3 | 15 January 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 05:40, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for January 22nd, 2007.
[edit]Weekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 3, Issue 4 | 22 January 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
Wikipedia modifies handling of "nofollow" tag | WikiWorld comic: "Truthiness" |
News and notes: Talk page template, milestones | Wikipedia in the News |
Features and admins | The Report on Lengthy Litigation |
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:17, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for January 29th, 2007.
[edit]Weekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 3, Issue 5 | 29 January 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 17:23, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for February 5th, 2007.
[edit]Weekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 3, Issue 6 | 5 February 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 04:53, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for February 12th, 2007.
[edit]Weekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 3, Issue 7 | 12 February 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 04:57, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for February 19th, 2007.
[edit]Weekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 3, Issue 8 | 19 February 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 07:06, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for February 26th, 2007.
[edit]Weekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 3, Issue 9 | 26 February 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 08:05, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for March 5th, 2007.
[edit]Weekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 3, Issue 10 | 5 March 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:08, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
You are still listed on the Admin coaching request page
[edit]Your name is still listed at Requests for an admin coach. If you are no longer looking for a coach, or you currently have one, please remove yourself from that list. Thank you. The Transhumanist 23:45, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
- You're at the top of the list for admin coaching right now; I understand you've been contacted a few times recently and may not have the time for coaching right now. If you are still interested, please let me know as I have finished with all my current coachees and am looking for a few more interested folks. As The Transhumanist mentioned above, please let us know if you are no longer interested by removing your name from the list. Shell babelfish 13:06, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for March 12th, 2007.
[edit]Weekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 3, Issue 11 | 12 March 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 05:11, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for March 20th, 2007.
[edit]Weekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 3, Issue 12 | 20 March 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
WikiWorld comic: "Wilhelm Scream" | News and notes: Bad sin, milestones |
Features and admins | Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News |
The Report on Lengthy Litigation |
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:57, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for March 26th, 2007.
[edit]Weekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 3, Issue 13 | 26 March 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 13:39, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for April 2nd, 2007.
[edit]Weekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 3, Issue 14 | 2 April 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 04:46, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for April 9th, 2007.
[edit]Weekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 3, Issue 15 | 9 April 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
Special note to spamlist users: Apologies for the formatting issues in previous issues. This only recently became a problem due to a change in HTML Tidy; however, I am to blame on this issue. Sorry, and all messages from this one forward should be fine (I hope!) -Ral315
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 07:50, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
Happy Birthday!
[edit]I saw on the Birthday Committee calendar that today is your birthday. I hope you have a great day! --Fang Aili talk 19:00, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for April 16th, 2007.
[edit]Weekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 3, Issue 16 | 16 April 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 05:43, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for April 23rd, 2007.
[edit]Weekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 3, Issue 17 | 23 April 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:28, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for April 30th, 2007.
[edit]Weekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 3, Issue 18 | 30 April 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:10, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for May 7th, 2007.
[edit]Weekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 3, Issue 19 | 7 May 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 05:55, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for May 14th, 2007.
[edit]Weekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 3, Issue 20 | 14 May 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 08:15, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for May 21st, 2007.
[edit]Weekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 3, Issue 21 | 21 May 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 05:00, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
Books
[edit]Please do not link to individual booksellers, and especially do not include affiliate links - if you just type the ISBN, Mediawiki will automagically reformat this to point to {{special|Booksearch}}
. Thanks, Guy (Help!) 14:18, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for May 28th, 2007.
[edit]Weekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 3, Issue 22 | 28 May 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 05:55, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for June 4th, 2007.
[edit]Weekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 3, Issue 23 | 4 June 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 07:04, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for June 11th, 2007.
[edit]Weekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 3, Issue 24 | 11 June 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 02:17, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for June 18th, 2007.
[edit]Weekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 3, Issue 25 | 18 June 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 08:23, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
Invite
[edit]Gregbard 21:38, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
Neutrality Project
[edit]Hi, I'm trying to ensure that the Neutrality Project has not become inactive. If you would still like to participate in it, please re-add your name to the Review Team list. Thanks, Jame§ugrono 07:29, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
Happy Birthday
[edit]Idontknow610TM 19:01, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
--SMS Talk 20:45, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
An invitation to join WikiProject Ohio
[edit]Hi, you are listed under Category:Wikipedians in Ohio or one of its subcategories. WikiProject Ohio has been slowing down and we're looking for active Ohioans to turn that around! But first, let us introduce ourselves; we're a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to Ohio and we're sure there's somewhere you'll fit in just fine. The project's departments include article quality assessment: We have over 5,000 articles to assess for class alone, newsletter writing: This has been delayed by a few months, and new page patrolling: Which has also been slowing down. We also have a newly formed taskforce on our over 1,000 townships at WP:OHTWP.
We have 132 members, many of which are not active within the project. If you are listed there and still received this message please accept the auotmated porcess's apologies. If you are interested in joining us please list you name here. If you're not interested please note this is a one time invite and you will never hear from us again.
If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to leave a message at our talkpage or with any member of the project, we'll be happy to answer any of your questions. We look forward to seeing you around!
Delivered by: §hepBot (Disable) 03:59, 25 October 2008 (UTC)
AfD: Manichaean paranoia
[edit]Hi! I've nominated the article Manichaean paranoia for deletion because I deem that it is not notable and cannot become notable, because of the inherent contradiction in this political phrase. I'm giving you a notice on this because you have contributed to the article and I deem you have rights to have a say in the matter. My elaborate analysis of the failures of the article can be read in Talk:Manichaean paranoia. The discussion for (and against) deletion is kept in this page (WP:AfD/Manichaean paranoia (2nd nomination). Be welcome to partake! ... said: Rursus (bork²) 13:44, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
Ohio meetup
[edit]Brainstorming is taking place! Feel free to check it out, and make sure to add your name to the possible attendees if you'd like more information, as this page is mostly gauging interest at the moment. hmwithτ 02:09, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
Are you from the Ohio area? A Wikipedian meetup is taking place on July 18, 2009 in Columbus. If you are interested in coming or would like more information, see the first Ohio meetup page. |
Thanks! --Rkitko (talk) 19:27, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
Better late than never no? I am trying to model the revamp of the Mass State Parks on the Pennsylvania State Parks featured list. any advice or assistance would be helpful - even if you are just commenting on my work, that would be enough to keep me going. EraserGirl (talk) 16:51, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Chinola. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").
Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chinola. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).
You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.
Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:07, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
Survey for new page patrollers
[edit]
New page patrol – Survey Invitation Hello Cafzal! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you.
Please click HERE to take part. You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey |
Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of Wiki Media Foundation at 12:03, 25 October 2011 (UTC).
Happy Birthday!
[edit]Orphaned non-free image File:Oxfordcompaniontophilosophycover.gif
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:Oxfordcompaniontophilosophycover.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 23:27, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
Quixotic plea
[edit] You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia talk:Wikipediholism test. Thanks. — {{U|Technical 13}} (e • t • c)
04:26, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:49, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
You're invited! Great Buckeye Wiknic 2016
[edit]Hello there! You are invited to attend the Great Buckeye Wiknic in Columbus, Ohio on Sunday, July 10th from 1:00 to 5:00 PM! Join us for a day in the park for food and socializing with others from the Wikimedia movement. We'll be meeting up at Fred Beekman Park, a park on Ohio State University's campus.
If you're interested, please take a look at our events page for more information, including parking info, food options, and available activities. If you plan on attending, please add your name to the attendees list. We look forward to seeing you!
If you have any questions, feel free to leave one on my talk page. Thanks! ~SuperHamster Talk Contribs 05:39, 29 June 2016 (UTC)
(Note: If you would like to stop receiving notifications regarding Wikimedia events around Ohio, you may remove your username from this list.)
New deal for page patrollers
[edit]Hi Cafzal,
In order to better control the quality of new pages, keep out the spam, and welcome the genuine newbies, the current system we introduced in 2011 is being updated and improved. The documentation and tutorials have also been revised and given a facelift. Most importantly a new user group New Page Reviewer has been created.
Under the new rule, you may find that you are temporarily unable to mark new pages as reviewed. However, this is nothing to worry about - most current experienced patrollers are being accorded the the new right without the need to apply, and if you have significant previous experience of patrolling new pages, we strongly encourage you to apply for the new right as soon as possible - we need all the help we can get, and we are now providing a dynamic, supportive environment for your work.
Find out more about this exiting new user right now at New Page Reviewers and be sure to read the new tutorial before applying. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:29, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Hello, Cafzal. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Elsa Jane Forest Guerin, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:
- edit the page
- remove the text that looks like this:
{{proposed deletion/dated...}}
- save the page
Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.
-- Aunva6talk - contribs 05:45, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
My new account
[edit]From now on, I will be editing Wikipedia under the name "TitanSymphony", so that I can make a fresh start here. TitanSymphony (talk) 15:35, 28 June 2019 (UTC)