User talk:Seishirou Sakurazuka

Welcome!

Hello, Seishirou Sakurazuka, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! -- Infrogmation 19:56, 16 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Please read WP:NPOV. --W(t) 01:50, 2005 Jun 14 (UTC)

Rainbow Top Logo?

First, I had to find out what logo that was - I've never heard it referred to as the "rainbow top" logo before, except on one obscure website. Your comment about the "rainbow top" logo being scary is pretty subjective, however. It also makes much more sense to compare it with other British production logos instead of American ones - as this is an article about a British production studio, operating in Britain. HowardBerry 5 July 2005 11:35 (UTC)

Doormatism

I don't think that's a real word. Why have you added it to so many articles here? Steve McKinney 04:50, 9 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

reply to your question

Sir- I replied to your querey on my talk page. Regards, Lyberty 19:40, 17 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Easy reverting

Hello, fellow X-Play protector. I noticed that you mentioned you had trouble reverting all the names in a recent vandalism. An easy way to do so is to click on the article's history, then click on the specific date/time you want to revert back to (for example, the one you wanted was 23:42, December 23, 2005), then click "edit this page". It will give you a warning that you are editing an out-of-date version of the article. Just click "save page" and you're done. That's for your hard work at protecting the page; I kind of gave up on the AotS article because it was vandalized so much. ~ Hibana 22:38, 24 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Seishirou.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Seishirou.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see User talk:Carnildo/images. 10:34, 25 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Gedza (computer virus)

I've nominated Gedza (computer virus), an article you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but in this particular case I do not feel that Gedza (computer virus) satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion; I have explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gedza (computer virus) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Gedza (computer virus) during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Inkpaduta 06:18, 5 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

barnstar

The Anime and manga BarnSakura is awarded to you for your many edits too gundam wing

Speedy deletion of Heavy sleeping

A tag has been placed on Heavy sleeping requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. —Cyclonenim^T@lk? 09:25, 20 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect of Hidrag Virus

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Hidrag Virus, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Hidrag Virus is a redirect to a non-existent page (CSD R1).

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Hidrag Virus, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 03:40, 5 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of The Pocket Guide to the Apocalypse

I have nominated The Pocket Guide to the Apocalypse, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Pocket Guide to the Apocalypse. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Fremte (talk) 15:06, 10 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:58, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of The Pocket Guide to the Apocalypse for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Pocket Guide to the Apocalypse is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Pocket Guide to the Apocalypse (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Sennecaster (What now?) 15:53, 17 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Midnight Spank

The article Midnight Spank has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable programming block

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:03, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Midnight Spank for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Midnight Spank is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Midnight Spank until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 02:07, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]