Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism
Appearance
Report active, obvious, and persistent vandals and spammers here. |
---|
Before reporting, read the spam and vandalism pages, as well as the AIV guide. To submit, edit this page and follow the instructions at the top of the "User-reported" section. For other issues, file a request for administrator attention. Important!
|
This page was last updated at 13:01 on 20 October 2024 (UTC).
if it is out of date.
This page has an administrative backlog that requires the attention of willing administrators. This notice will be automatically removed by HBC AIV helperbot14 (talk) when the backlog is cleared. |
Reports
[edit]- 876made (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped disruption-catching filters five times in the last 5 minutes (details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 05:16, 20 October 2024 (UTC)
- Skibididobdobdobyesyesyes (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped disruption-catching filters five times in the last 5 minutes (details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 08:25, 20 October 2024 (UTC)
- Rajarmmohan (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1320 (LTA 1320, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 10:07, 20 October 2024 (UTC)
User-reported
[edit]- worldbruce (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Reporting user User:worldbruce for repeatedly removing information from articles about schools in Bangladesh without proper sourcing or discussion, and for nominating an article for deletion. This behavior is problematic. For reference, you can view their contribution list here: Special:Contributions/worldbruce. It's important to note that these are schools, which typically do not receive coverage in newspapers and Wikipedia depends on contributions from users like us to provide comprehensive information on such topics. Cerium4B (talk)
- WP:BOOMERANG may apply. One has to make allowances for an editor who has been contributing for only a month, and whose first language may not be English, either of which may make it difficult for them to understand Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. But in their short time here they've managed to make many mistakes — adding unverifiable content, removing reliably sourced content, creating articles about non-notable topics, making bad page moves, violating copyright, and this report. --Worldbruce (talk) 06:53, 20 October 2024 (UTC)
- Declined. Disagreeing with an edit does not make that edit "Vandalism", especially not if the edits in question are aimed at having articles only include verifiable information, which is the whole point. As such, this is not the right place to have this conversation. If there are further-reaching behavioural issues, these are better addressed at WP:ANI. --Blablubbs (talk) 12:22, 20 October 2024 (UTC)
- Kana devsi (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – actions evidently indicate a vandalism-only account. This is an SPA whose sole intent as shown by their editing history is to attack someone sharing that name. 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 10:24, 20 October 2024 (UTC)
- 2001:999:500:413C:5F7A:3ADB:56DC:1FCF (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) new IP used for mass blanking.-Loned (talk) 12:33, 20 October 2024 (UTC)
- @Loned: Their last edit was three days ago, they were blocked at the time and appear to have stopped since. Am I missing something? --Blablubbs (talk) 12:37, 20 October 2024 (UTC)
- Ikan Kekek (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) cross wiki abuse, LTA sock