User talk:Miq
Welcome, newcomer! Hope you have a great time using us!!
Here are some useful tips to ease you into the Wikipedia experience:
- First, take a look at the Wikipedia Tutorial, and perhaps dabble a bit in the test area.
- When you have some free time, take a look at the Manual of Style and Policies and Guidelines. They can come in very handy!
- Remember to use a neutral point of view!
- If you need any help, feel free to post a question at the Help Desk
- Explore, be bold in editing pages, and, most importantly, have fun!
Also, here are some odds and ends that I find useful from time to time:
- Wikipedia:Policy Library
- Wikipedia:Utilities
- Wikipedia:Cite your sources
- Wikipedia:Verifiability
- Wikipedia:Wikiquette
- Wikipedia:Civility
- Wikipedia:Conflict resolution
- Wikipedia:Brilliant prose
- Wikipedia:Pages needing attention
- Wikipedia:Peer review
- Wikipedia:Bad jokes and other deleted nonsense
- Wikipedia:Village pump
- Wikipedia:Boilerplate text
Feel free to ask me anything the links and talk pages don't answer. You can most easily reach me by posting on my talk page.
You can sign your name on any page by typing 4 tildes, likes this: ~~~~.
Best of luck, and have fun!
ClockworkSoul 04:44, 28 Feb 2005 (UTC)
Hello. Think that Fruska Gora National Park should not be {{copyvio}} if you provided correct link. That site is official site of Serbian gov. According Copywrith Law of Serbia products of gov. bodies should be {{PD}}. --Ninam 21:18, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Thanks for the heads up. I reverted and removed the note from CP page. Miq 22:59, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC)
:) --Ninam 23:01, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Nice stub! Always good to see another link on Wikipedia:List_of_missing_Africa_topics go blue... --Dvyost 22:14, 4 November 2005 (UTC)
Question
[edit]I see you redirected Outrage! to OutRage!. I think it might be better if this were left in its previous state as a redirect to Outrage (a disambiguation page) since there is also a board game called "Outrage!". I would love to hear your thoughts on this! Thanks, Dar-Ape 18:32, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
- Doh! Didn't bother to check the history, it's reverted now. Miq 18:43, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
Vruk Deletion
[edit]I have added a "{{prod}}" template to the article Vruk, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}}
notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached.--Matt 11:57, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
Stop your vandalism
[edit]Please stop vandalizing the leg warmers page. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.117.206.101 (talk) 21:29, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
I didn't vandalize anything. why did you simply accuse me of something I didn't do? I have a dynamic IP and it was not me who made changes to any of the pages you mentioned. My user name is aj1976122.164.54.30 (talk) 04:51, 21 October 2008 (UTC)
- By vandalism I meant this and this edit. I'm sorry for the inconvenience but there's no other way of warning vandals using dynamic IP. Miq (talk) 13:09, 21 October 2008 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:57, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]Hello, Miq. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)