Delete; These pages refer to a supposed nation that exists only in the minds of its perpetrators. UninvitedCompany 21:30, 30 Mar 2004 (UTC)
You have edited this to vote delete, and that's o.k., but I would appreciate it if you would explain to me how this assessment differs from what is acknowledged in the articles, which is that we're talking about a former micronation and a micronation. Not to mention that there has been some activity outside of "the minds of its perpetrators," as stated in the article. --Daniel C. Boyer 18:38, 6 Apr 2004 (UTC)
What on earth are you talking about? Do you even know what a micronation is? And what is your support for this assertion? The supposed nation at least exists on artistamps, and this has been proven by the posted souvenir sheet. --Daniel C. Boyer 15:28, 31 Mar 2004 (UTC)
Pinica was created after Duchy of Pinica was already deleted. Delete all. RickK | Talk 01:35, 31 Mar 2004 (UTC)
That is false. Moreover, Pinica was changed from a redirect to the deleted Duchy of Pinica to Imperial Post. I find it fascinating that you choose to duck all my questions and yet keep expressing (factually-inaccurately-based) opinions on them. --Daniel C. Boyer 15:26, 31 Mar 2004 (UTC)
What is your basis for this allegation? --Daniel C. Boyer 22:13, 31 Mar 2004 (UTC)
That souvenir sheet is enough to convince me that the microstate probably does exist, in so far as it has advocates or play-actors or whatever you want to call them. So I say keep, but the articles need to emphasize exactly what these things are. Everyking 23:07, 31 Mar 2004 (UTC)
It sounds like a micronation to me, and one that has plenty of members and presence on the Net at that. Wiwaxia 04:21, 2 Apr 2004 (UTC)
Delete. The souvenir sheet convinces me that it exists but not that it is notable. I have not seen any arguments why this particular producer of artistamps is important. Andris 20:02, 2 Apr 2004 (UTC)
