Wikipedia:Requests for bureaucratship/Cprompt

cprompt

I've been a sysop here for quite a while, and somewhat recently on the Simple English Wikipedia. I believe in the philosophy that being a sysop is "no big deal", and requests should only be denied if the community fears that a user will abuse the few powers given to sysops. I'm not a fan of sysops taking unilateral action, and I do not think that I have ever abused my awesome sysop powers. cprompt 18:16, 23 Feb 2004 (UTC)

Support:

1. Lirath Q. Pynnor
2. It's all about trust, and I certainly think that cprompt is trustworthy enough to use the power that comes with bureaucracy responsibly. Metasquares 13:05, 24 Feb 2004 (UTC)
3. Perl 23:37, 24 Feb 2004 (UTC)
4. RickK 04:07, 25 Feb 2004 (UTC)
5. Trustworthy, and has gained Lir's trust. --Uncle Ed 15:58, 25 Feb 2004 (UTC)
6. Support. --Jiang
7. Support. Meelar 01:12, 28 Feb 2004 (UTC)
8. Support. Crackshoe 17:40, 28 Feb 2004 (UTC) (This is a sock puppet account →Raul654)
   • No, it's a friend of mine who I've introduced to Wikipedia today. Disregard the vote if newbies don't count. --cprompt 19:31, 28 Feb 2004 (UTC)
     • I'm not a sock puppet, and i've started entry on Slick Idiot and added a Misfits filmography. It just took me a few hours before i had time to start editing. Crackshoe 21:40, 28 Feb 2004 (UTC)
   • I apologize for labelling you a socket puppet, but under the circumstances, it was a reasonable thing to think. Please do not be discouraged, I meant you no offense. →Raul654 21:47, Feb 28, 2004 (UTC)

Oppose:

1. Oppose. Prone to making unfair accusations 172 02:56, 28 Feb 2004 (UTC)

Tally: 8 support, 0 oppose -- ends 18:16, 01 Mar 2004 (UTC)