Talk:The Royale

Television: Episode coverage Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by the Episode coverage task force.

More information:
/
	This article lacks sufficient references and adequate inline citations. Please provide any citations per verifiability and reliable sources.
	A production section needs to be added to this article, or the current one needs to be expanded. This section discusses the "behind the scenes" aspects of the production process, award nominations, and insights into the casting and staffing where possible.
	A response section needs to be added to this article, or the current one needs to be expanded. This section should be well cited using neutral and reliable sources that discuss the reaction of both critics and the viewing audience to the show. Additionally, document any impact the show has had on society, and merchandise that may have resulted from the show, such as toys, games, etc.

Star Trek Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Star Trek, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to all Star Trek-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Star TrekWikipedia:WikiProject Star TrekTemplate:WikiProject Star TrekStar Trek articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Science Fiction Low‑importance

	Speculative fiction portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Science Fiction, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science fiction on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Science FictionWikipedia:WikiProject Science FictionTemplate:WikiProject Science Fictionscience fiction articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

This page was proposed for deletion December 2004. The discussion is archived at Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/The Royale.

Unless you're counting cards

The article says "In the scene where Lt. Commander Data observes a couple playing blackjack, he advises a woman that "the odds favor standing pat" on her total of hard thirteen against a dealer's king up; the optimal play is to take a card." But that is only true if you are NOT counting cards. Data certainly would have the capability to count every card in the deck, and if he knew that the odds of the next card being a 10 or face card was very high, then his advice could very well be right. 50.46.109.40 (talk) 22:19, 21 January 2019 (UTC) Toby Nixon[reply]

Came here to say the same thing, four years on..! Scifiandotherthings (talk) 12:55, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

But maybe he didn't count:

TEXAS: How'd you? Shut my mouth. Hey, you're not one of them card counting fellas, are you?
DATA: The number of the cards and their values remain quite constant. What would be the purpose in counting them?

Paditor (talk) 17:07, 26 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Same set as for Vic Fontaine's club in DS9?

The set for the casino looks the same as the one used in Deep Space 9. Compare to Badda-Bing Badda-Bang. Can someone confirm this? I imagine the set was used for lots of productions. 70.115.191.80 (talk) 09:11, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Star trek Orginal series

This would have been a great Star trek Orginal series......Kirk as Riker...Spock as Data....mcCoy as Worf — Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.102.71.164 (talk) 15:25, 26 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]