Talk:Kata Tjuta

This level-5 vital article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Australia: Places / Northern Territory Mid‑importance

	Australia portal Kata Tjuta is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian places (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Northern Territory (assessed as High-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia, or the Northern Territory Library.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Mountains Mid‑importance

	Mountains portal This article is part of WikiProject Mountains, a project to systematically present information on mountains. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit the article attached to this page (see Contributing FAQ for more information), or visit the project page where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.MountainsWikipedia:WikiProject MountainsTemplate:WikiProject MountainsMountain articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Geography Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Geography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of geography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GeographyWikipedia:WikiProject GeographyTemplate:WikiProject Geographygeography articles

Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Geography To-do list:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : See Requested articles/Social sciences/Geography, cities, regions and named places and Missing articles about Locations
Assess : Tag related article talk pages with {{WikiProject Geography}}. To help assess the quality and importance of geography articles, please see: Unassessed geography articles and Unknown-importance geography articles.
Cleanup : See Geography articles needing attention
Deletion sorting : Listed at Geographic related deletion discussions
Geographical coordinates : See Articles missing geocoordinate data by country
Infobox : See Geography articles needing infoboxes
Map : See Wikipedia requested maps
Notability : See Geography articles with topics of unclear notability
Photo : See Wikipedia requested photographs of places
Stubs : See Geography stubs

World Heritage Sites

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject World Heritage Sites, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of World Heritage Sites on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.World Heritage SitesWikipedia:WikiProject World Heritage SitesTemplate:WikiProject World Heritage SitesWorld Heritage Sites articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Picture

Added one of my own photos taken in November 1997.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Steve nova (talk • contribs) 04:31, 24 March 2004.

Namesake

Hi, I think "the Olgas" were named after the Queen of Württemberg (Olga Nikolajewna Romanowa), not of Spain. (see e.g. [1]). As far as I know, it never exsists a spanish Queen with the name Olga... Gruß Kookaburra 21:38, 9 August 2005

Article name

The issue of the appropriate name for Australian landmarks such as Uluru/Ayers Rock and Kata Tjuta/The Olgas is a sensitive one that has been debated for a number of years. Wikipedia has no role to play in that debate. It is appropriate that Wikipedia sidestep the debate by adopting the official name. In this case, the official name, according to the Gazetteer of Australia (link) is Kata Tjuta. Snottygobble | Talk 02:05, 5 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I beg your pardon; I am in error. A dual naming policy has been adopted. The official name of Uluru/Ayers Rock is literally "Uluru/Ayers Rock". Similarly, the official name of Kata Tjuta appears to be "Kata Tjuta/Mount Olga". Snottygobble | Talk 02:19, 5 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Geology

The "no one is entirely sure" claim seems to be dispelled by http://www.deh.gov.au/parks/uluru/natural/geology.html which has an explanation of the formation of this feature which should be incorporated into the article.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Beland (talk • contribs) 10:16, 22 October 2006.

Composition

Also isn't Kata Tjuta composed of a conglomerate rock?—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 203.214.75.49 (talk • contribs) 08:13, 31 December 2006.

Yes, that is correct (conglomerate). It's really cool looking up close ! (allthough not what what I expected as a non geologist). --User:Tanail (Boris Wawrik) 23:00, Jan 08,2007 (EST)

Number of domes

These rock formations are a remarkable group of 36 domes (now only 28), made from... Where are the missing 8 domes gone? --62.176.232.130 14:05, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah really. That was inserted by User:192.43.227.18 which is an address used by the University Of Adelaide and was probably just some college kid fooling around. I removed it. Herostratus 19:14, 11 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

What does this mean exactly?

"Along with Uluru, 25 km to the east, Kata Tjuta forms one of two major landmarks within the Uluru-Kata Tjuta National Park."

Perhaps I should ask not what it means, but what it is meant to mean. The statement is also made on the Uluru page.

What this actually means is that Uluru and Kata Tju together make up one (yes just one) of the two major landmarks. And the question must be, well, if they are one of the landmarks, what is the other one?

If this isn't what is meant then it should say either:

Kata Tju and Uluru make up the two major landmarks of...

Kata Tju and Uluru are the two major landmarks of...

Togther with Uluru, Kata Tju is a major landmark of...

When someone has fixed this, please fix Uluru as well. --Amandajm 03:33, 20 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Although I think the wording is ambiguous, I think the first wording you suggested is better so I've altered the page. Robert Brockway 08:13, 12 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Kata Tjuta. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/5mr7pRhpn to http://www.environment.gov.au/parks/uluru/index.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:09, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Name

Is Kata Tjuta the name of the entire range, as the introductory sentence says, or just Mt. Olga, as it says later? We should clarify it, I think. - DavidWBrooks (talk) 21:38, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]