Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates
Skip to: |
Featured pictures are images that add significantly to articles, either by illustrating article content particularly well, or being eye-catching to the point where users will want to read its accompanying article. Taking the adage that "a picture is worth a thousand words", the images featured on Wikipedia:Featured pictures should illustrate a Wikipedia article in such a way as to add significantly to that article, according to the featured picture criteria.
If you believe an image should be featured, create a subpage (use the "For Nominations" field, below) and add the subpage to the current nominations section. For promotion, if an image is listed here for ten days with five or more reviewers in support and the consensus is in its favor, it can be added to the Wikipedia:Featured pictures list. Consensus is generally regarded to be a two-thirds majority in support, including the nominator and/or creator of the image; however, anonymous votes are generally disregarded, as are opinions of sockpuppets. All users may comment. However, only those who have been on Wikipedia for 25 days and with at least 100 edits will be included in the numerical count. If necessary, decisions about close candidacies will be made on a case-by-case basis. Nominations started in December are given three extra days, due to the holidays slowing down activity here. The archive contains all opinions and comments collected for candidate nominations and their nomination results. If you nominate an image here, please consider also uploading and nominating it at Commons to help ensure that the pictures can be used not just in the English Wikipedia but on all other Wikimedia projects as well.
A featured picture can be nominated for delisting if you feel it no longer lives up to featured picture standards. You may also request a featured picture be replaced with a superior image. Create a subpage (use the "For Delists" field, below) and add the subpage to the current nominations section. Please leave a note on the talk page of the original FPC nominator (and creator/uploader, if appropriate) to let them know the delisting is being debated. The user may be able to address the issues and avoid the delisting of the picture. For delisting, if an image is listed here for ten days with five or more reviewers supporting a delist or replace, and the consensus is in its favor, it will be delisted from Wikipedia:Featured pictures. Consensus is generally regarded to be a two-thirds majority in support, including the nominator. Note that anonymous votes are generally disregarded, as are opinions of sockpuppets. However, images are sometimes delisted despite having fewer than five in support of their removal, and there is currently no consensus on how best to handle delist closures, except that:If the image to be delisted is not used in any articles by the time of closure, it must be delisted. If it is added to articles during the nomination, at least one week's stability is required for the nomination to be closed as "Kept". The nomination may be suspended if a week hasn't yet passed to give the rescue a chance. Outside of the nominator, all voters are expected to have been on Wikipedia for 25 days and to have made a minimum of 100 edits. If necessary, decisions about close candidacies will be made on a case-by-case basis. As with regular nominations, delist nominations are given three extra days to run if started in December.
|
Featured picture tools: |
Step 1:
Evaluate Evaluate the merit of a nomination against the featured picture criteria. Most users reference terms from this page when evaluating nominations. |
Step 2:
Create a subpage
To create a subpage of Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates for your nomination, add a title for the image you want to nominate in the field below (e.g., Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Labrador Retriever) and click the "Create new nomination" button.
To create a subpage for your delist, add a title for the image you want to delist/replace in the field below and click the "Create new delist nomination" button.
|
Step 3:
Transclude and link Transclude the newly created subpage to the Featured picture candidate list ( ). |
How to comment for Candidate Images
How to comment for Delist Images
Editing candidates
Is my monitor adjusted correctly? In a discussion about the brightness of an image, it is necessary to know if the computer display is properly adjusted. Displays differ greatly in their ability to show shadow detail. There are four dark grey circles in the adjacent image. If you can discern three (or even four) of the circles, your monitor can display shadow detail correctly. If you see fewer than three circles, you may need to adjust the monitor and/or computer display settings. Some displays cannot be adjusted for ideal shadow detail. Please take this into account when voting. Displays also differ greatly in their ability to show highlight detail. There are light grey circles in the adjacent image. If you can discern three (or even four) of the circles, your monitor can display highlight detail correctly. If you see fewer than three circles, you may need to adjust the monitor and/or computer display settings (probably reduce the contrast setting). Some displays cannot be adjusted for ideal highlight detail. Please take this into account when voting. On a gamma-adjusted display, the four circles in the color image blend into the background when seen from a few feet (roughly 75–150 cm) away. If they do not, you could adjust the gamma setting (found in the computer's settings, not on the display), until they do. This may be very difficult to attain, and a slight error is not detrimental. Uncorrected PC displays usually show the circles darker than the background. Note that the image must be viewed in original size (263 × 68 pixels) - if enlarged or reduced, results are not accurate. Note that on most consumer LCD displays (laptop or flat screen), viewing angle strongly affects these images. Correct adjustment on one part of the screen might be incorrect on another part for a stationary head position. Click on the images for more technical information. If possible, calibration with a hardware monitor calibrator is recommended. |
- To see recent changes, .
FPCs needing feedback
|
---|
Current nominations
[edit]Voting period ends on 18 Oct 2024 at 19:34:04 (UTC)
- Reason
- I saw this pop up in On This Day for Oct. 8 and think it's pretty good. This is a crop from this version, and I think an improvement, since the color plates didn't line up cleanly with the printed border. There's good detail in close up; what irregularities there are are aspects of the original print (that is, overprinting with successive color layers that often have hard edges). There is some mild browning on the paper itself, but the sepia tint to the bottom area is its own printed color, as is clear on the uncut version.
- Articles in which this image appears
- Great Chicago Fire, 1871
- FP category for this image
- Wikipedia:Featured pictures/History/American
- Creator
- Original by Currier & Ives, exact author unknown; crop by GreenMeansGo
- Support as nominator – Moonreach (talk) 19:34, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- I'm not sure my !vote counts, but yes, I do think this is an extremely important historical image. There are so many equally impactful historical events where we don't have the benefit of a quality illustration. GMGtalk 10:39, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
- Is there any info extant re how accurate this artist's depiction may be? (Photography existed then.) – Sca (talk) 13:07, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
- Copelin & Hine have a number of photos available currently on Commons, but they're all about the aftermath. Photos existed, but I'm not sure they were common enough, or easily usable enough that people were really running toward the fire trying to snap a shot. File:Destruction of Chicago by Fire, Oct. 1871 LCCN2003662862.jpg is really good too, but again, it's a litho. GMGtalk 13:37, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
- Is there any info extant re how accurate this artist's depiction may be? (Photography existed then.) – Sca (talk) 13:07, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support - Beautiful lithograph. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 13:10, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 18 Oct 2024 at 02:05:18 (UTC)
- Reason
- Very high quality map, featuring the Shanghai International Settlement and the Shanghai French Concession within central Shanghai.
- Articles in which this image appears
- Shanghai International Settlement
- FP category for this image
- Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Diagrams, drawings, and maps/Maps
- Creator
- Rosemania
- Support as nominator – GodzillamanRor (talk) 02:05, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 18 Oct 2024 at 01:00:41 (UTC)
- Reason
- It shows one of the most influential and innovative people ever, Steve Jobs, with one of his greatest business achievements before he died. It is also a very high quality image of Jobs.
- Articles in which this image appears
- Steve Jobs, iPhone 4
- FP category for this image
- Wikipedia:Featured pictures/People/Science and engineering
- Creator
- Matt Yohe
- Support as nominator – Wcamp9 (talk) 01:00, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- Comment – Promo-style pic of scant EV for most readers/viewers. – Sca (talk) 12:24, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose – Blurry up close and the screen of the iPhone is pretty washed out. I also feel like this is tantamount to advertising. While promotional aspects aren't in the featured picture criteria, I feel like that aspect works against criteria #3, that featured images be Wikipedia's best work. Moonreach (talk) 15:15, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose – I agree it's very unsharp. Bammesk (talk) 02:55, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 18 Oct 2024 at 00:50:12 (UTC)
- Reason
- Probably the most high-quality image of Mercury, in which he is performing live in one of his famous flambouyant outfits in 1977. This is one of the best images of Mercury (once nominated 14 years ago but not promoted). I believe this is an interesting photo, which really captures Mercury's well-known energy in his concerts
- Articles in which this image appears
- Freddie Mercury, Stage name, etc.
- FP category for this image
- Wikipedia:Featured pictures/People/Entertainment
- Creator
- Carl Lender, restored by Lošmi
- Support as nominator – Wcamp9 (talk) 00:50, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- Comment – Dark, poor detail, backlit. – Sca (talk) 12:30, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- Comment – I'm okay with overlooking the darkness, given that this kind of environment is where Mercury made most of his public appearances, but it seems like no part of the image is fully in focus. But for that, I'd support; it's a very dynamic photo and the scan quality is high enough to get the film grain. Moonreach (talk) 15:07, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support - Given that this is an action shot from 1977, taken in low quality lighting, with what had to have been high speed film... Yes, it's out of focus - I'm thinking, based on sharpness, this was a low F-number that ended up focusing on his crotch. It's also an excellent shot given the difficulties and technology of the time. (Heck, there are times when I can't even get that quality with newer tech). — Chris Woodrich (talk) 13:15, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 17 Oct 2024 at 10:57:32 (UTC)
- Reason
- "one of the most famous photographs ever made" and "a benchmark of modernism in the history of photography"
- Articles in which this image appears
- Nautilus (photograph), Edward Weston
- FP category for this image
- Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Artwork/Others
- Creator
- Edward Weston
- Support as nominator I have been looking for some time for a good copy. At least I found an acceptable one. Seeing the price of a print, I don't think some contributor could get one and scan it. – Yann (talk) 10:57, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Comment I'm seeing a lot of dust. Restoration would be beneficial. Crisco 1492 mobile (talk) 12:02, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Yes, right. Done. I wonder if this auction house cleans its items before photographing them. Yann (talk) 13:37, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- There's still a bit of the edge visible on the left sideCrisco 1492 mobile (talk) 15:24, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- And now? Yann (talk) 16:43, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Still about 3-5 px. It's looking very good, though. Excellent find. Crisco 1492 mobile (talk) 16:48, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Hopefully, it is OK now. Yann (talk) 10:29, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Yep! — Chris Woodrich (talk) 12:32, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- Comment – Old hat, i.e. too familiar. – Sca (talk) 13:09, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Bammesk (talk) 02:58, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 17 Oct 2024 at 00:25:13 (UTC)
- Reason
- It is a very high quality image, and it is accurate too. It shows three of the Mozart's (Wolfgang Amadeus, Maria Anna, and Leopold) during their lifetime, along with a portrait of their dead mother, Anna Maria. It may have one of the best depictions of the best composers and the rest of his family
- Articles in which this image appears
- Mozart family, Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart, Leopold Mozart, Maria Anna Mozart
- FP category for this image
- Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Artwork/Paintings
- Creator
- Johann Nepomuk della Croce
- Support as nominator – Wcamp9 (talk) 00:25, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Moonreach (talk) 15:30, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Jusdafax (talk) 01:59, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 16 Oct 2024 at 21:51:46 (UTC)
- Reason
- Portrait of renowned physicist and 1918 Nobel Prize winner Max Planck.
- Articles in which this image appears
- Max Planck, List of things named after Max Planck, +1
- FP category for this image
- Wikipedia:Featured pictures/People/Science and engineering
- Creator
- Hugo Erfurth, Restored by: Bammesk
- Support as nominator – Bammesk (talk) 21:51, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 05:26, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Yann (talk) 09:51, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Crisco 1492 mobile (talk) 12:03, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support – High historical EV for quantum physics; confidant of Einstein. – Sca (talk) 13:20, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support – ZZZ'S 01:05, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 06:20, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Moonreach (talk) 15:30, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 16 Oct 2024 at 14:58:21 (UTC)
- Reason
- good quality image of the temple, FP on commons
- Articles in which this image appears
- Galtaji
- FP category for this image
- Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture
- Creator
- Sharvarism
- Support as nominator – UnpetitproleX (talk) 14:58, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Love the color combo here. --Petar Milošević (talk) 09:37, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support – This is my favorite place in Jaipur. Yann (talk) 09:52, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Crisco 1492 mobile (talk) 12:04, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Good EV. --Tagooty (talk) 13:58, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 06:17, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Moonreach (talk) 15:31, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 16 Oct 2024 at 11:22:42 (UTC)
- Reason
- Unanimously featured on Commons. High resolution.
- Articles in which this image appears
- Exposition Universelle (1900)
- FP category for this image
- Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Diagrams, drawings, and maps/Maps
- Creator
- GTC
- Support as nominator – MER-C 11:22, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support as uploader – Thanks for the nomination. Yann (talk) 12:50, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support – UnpetitproleX (talk) 15:00, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 05:24, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Crisco 1492 mobile (talk) 12:05, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 06:19, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- Comment – I like this image a lot, but there's a fair amount of water spotting in the upper left corner, particularly in the sky. There's also a vertical band of lighter color about a quarter of the way in from the left side, and it runs all the way from top to bottom. Moonreach (talk) 15:37, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- That's an issue with the document, not the reproduction, so I am not sure we should touch that. Yann (talk) 07:48, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 16 Oct 2024 at 10:50:57 (UTC)
- Reason
- Unanimously featured on Commons last month. Headline image.
- Articles in which this image appears
- Usambiro barbet
- FP category for this image
- Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds
- Creator
- Giles Laurent
- Support as nominator – MER-C 10:50, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Giles Laurent (talk) 16:24, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 05:25, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Petar Milošević (talk) 09:35, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Yann (talk) 09:56, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Good EV --Tagooty (talk) 13:59, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support – ZZZ'S 01:06, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 06:18, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 15 Oct 2024 at 22:24:07 (UTC)
- Reason
- A delightful example of WWI propaganda.
- Articles in which this image appears
- Daddy, What Did You Do in the Great War? +2
- FP category for this image
- Wikipedia:Featured pictures/History/WWI
- Creator
- Savile Lumley/Johnson Riddle and Company, restored by User:Adam Cuerden
- Support as nominator – Adam Cuerden (talk)Has about 8.9% of all FPs. 22:24, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 05:22, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support. MER-C 11:15, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Yann (talk) 12:52, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Giles Laurent (talk) 16:24, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Moonreach (talk) 15:33, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 15 Oct 2024 at 21:39:51 (UTC)
- Reason
- Three Nobel Prize laureates in physics photographed in 1931. In front row from left to right: Albert A. Michelson (1907 laureate), Albert Einstein (1921 laureate), Robert A. Millikan (1923 laureate). In back row from left to right: astronomer Walter Sydney Adams, mathematician Walther Mayer, historian Max Farrand.
- Articles in which this image appears
- Nobel Prize in Physics
- FP category for this image
- Wikipedia:Featured pictures/People/Science and engineering
- Creator
- Smithsonian Institution, Photographer: unknown, Restored by: Bammesk
- Support as nominator – Bammesk (talk) 21:39, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 05:29, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support. MER-C 11:31, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support – High historical EV. Taken two years before Einstein left his native Germany, never to return. – Sca (talk) 12:45, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
- I would support a grayscale version. This looks yellowish. Yann (talk) 12:54, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
- Done, although I disagree doing it to every B&W photo. Pinging participants, if there is any objection, let me know and I will revert back to the earlier version (which was voted on). @Hamid Hassani, MER-C, Sca, Yann, and Giles Laurent:. Bammesk (talk) 22:02, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
- Fine w/me. -- Sca (talk) 13:26, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- PS: Typically of Einstein, his mind seems to be somewhere else. (Currently plowing through a detailed biography of him.) -- Sca (talk) 13:15, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
- Fine w/me. -- Sca (talk) 13:26, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Done, although I disagree doing it to every B&W photo. Pinging participants, if there is any objection, let me know and I will revert back to the earlier version (which was voted on). @Hamid Hassani, MER-C, Sca, Yann, and Giles Laurent:. Bammesk (talk) 22:02, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Giles Laurent (talk) 16:24, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Great! Yann (talk) 09:49, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support – ZZZ'S 01:07, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 06:22, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support —Bruce1eetalk 09:31, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Moonreach (talk) 15:33, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 14 Oct 2024 at 18:36:22 (UTC)
- Reason
- Beautiful sculpture, and the image itself is excellent.
- Articles in which this image appears
- Jadeite Cabbage +1
- FP category for this image
- Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Artwork/Sculpture
- Creator
- Unknown; photograph by the National Palace Museum
- Support as nominator – — Chris Woodrich (talk) 18:36, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Moonreach (talk) 19:07, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 04:30, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support - Excellent photo of this important (and very impressive) item. Nick-D (talk) 07:29, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 14:12, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support. MER-C 16:38, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Giles Laurent (talk) 16:23, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support – It is great that the museum offers free pictures. Yann (talk) 10:00, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 14 Oct 2024 at 15:41:56 (UTC)
- Reason
- Official White House presidential portrait of US President Thomas Jefferson. A prior nomination for this painting failed, but that one was an attempt to promote a lower-resolution image that didn't make the 1500px cutoff.
- Articles in which this image appears
- Thomas Jefferson, Democratic-Republican Party, many others (including List of Assassin's Creed characters)
- FP category for this image
- Wikipedia:Featured pictures/People/Political
- Creator
- Rembrandt Peale
- Support as nominator – Moonreach (talk) 15:41, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Google seems to have a new version now. Will try and get it. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 18:38, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
- Okay, so the GARTS version is compressed and has unrealistic contrast levels. So Support. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 18:42, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 04:31, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 14:12, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 13 Oct 2024 at 16:09:14 (UTC)
- Reason
- A very good and high-quality version of a somewhat famous poster to a very iconic movie
- Articles in which this image appears
- Citizen Kane
- FP category for this image
- Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Culture, entertainment, and lifestyle/Film
- Creator
- William Rose
- Support as nominator – Wcamp9 (talk) 16:09, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose - JPG artifacting is pretty bad. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 22:41, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Multiple creases on the poster, plus lots of macroblocking in the image (note the patterns around the letters in the cast list, or the rainbow square patterns that show up in the light sections of Welles's hair). hinnk (talk) 05:42, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose, per above. – Hamid Hassani (talk) 04:32, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 13 Oct 2024 at 10:09:15 (UTC)
- Reason
- met all criteria for FP, become world known cycler, winner of TDF × 3, Giro × 1, World Champion in 2024, tactical amazing rider
- Articles in which this image appears
- Tadej Pogačar, UCI men's road racing world ranking
- FP category for this image
- Wikipedia:Featured pictures/People/Sport
- Creator
- Petar Milošević
- Support as nominator – Petar Milošević (talk) 10:09, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support - High technical quality, as always. Image is from a podium celebration, and thus relevant to notability (EV). — Chris Woodrich (talk) 22:43, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Moonreach (talk) 15:31, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 04:34, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 14:11, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support. MER-C 16:49, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Giles Laurent (talk) 16:23, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 13 Oct 2024 at 00:50:38 (UTC)
- Reason
- excellent image of the revered mountain; featured on commons
- Articles in which this image appears
- Gumbok Rangan
- FP category for this image
- Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Places/Landscapes
- Creator
- Tagooty
- Support as nominator – UnpetitproleX (talk) 00:50, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support @UnpetitproleX: Thanks for the nomination. --Tagooty (talk) 03:02, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Petar Milošević (talk) 10:32, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Yann (talk) 18:47, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 22:44, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 04:34, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 14:11, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support. MER-C 16:47, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support – ZZZ'S 22:30, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Giles Laurent (talk) 16:23, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 12 Oct 2024 at 19:33:32 (UTC)
- Reason
- I think this is a good exemplar of many of the aspects of pixel art: A limited color palette, the use of complementary colors to create the illusion of a gradient, places where emphasis is placed on individual pixels (such as highlights and the border) and places where a blended effect is desired (the beard and the tones of the face). The one thing it doesn't have that I wish it did is dithering in the gradient areas, but that's not a mandatory aspect of the medium.
- Articles in which this image appears
- Pixel art
- FP category for this image
- Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Artwork/Others
- Creator
- Original art by ReffPixels, vectorization by OmegaFallon
- Support as nominator – Moonreach (talk) 19:33, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- Comment – Meh. Lacks visual interest, EV. –Sca (talk) 12:54, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
- Comment I think for EV, File:Pixel Art Cat with Zoom-in Detail.svg is probably the better choice. That being said, this is good pixel art - and I say this as an aficionado of the genre. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 22:46, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
- That was actually my first choice, but I decided against it for a few reasons. The color selection (not just the palette but the full gamut it implies) is mostly browns and blues, there's not much to indicate how shadows are represented, and there are large areas of flat color. I also dislike the inset detail box, which is just under a 2x magnification and therefore just browbeats the viewer with information they already have. So I went through Commons, found another piece of pixel art I felt illustrated the concept better, added it to the page and waited a week. Moonreach (talk) 15:20, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
- This is definitely something that looks more like typical pixel art games of the 90s. Adam Cuerden (talk)Has about 8.9% of all FPs. 15:14, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
- As a character portrait, perhaps. It is still more detailed than anything before the PS1 could have reasonably handled! Crisco 1492 mobile (talk) 12:08, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Eh, don't forget computer games. Something circa Kings Quest 6 or Kyrandia 2? Adam Cuerden (talk)Has about 8.9% of all FPs. 07:41, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- As a character portrait, perhaps. It is still more detailed than anything before the PS1 could have reasonably handled! Crisco 1492 mobile (talk) 12:08, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- This is definitely something that looks more like typical pixel art games of the 90s. Adam Cuerden (talk)Has about 8.9% of all FPs. 15:14, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
- That was actually my first choice, but I decided against it for a few reasons. The color selection (not just the palette but the full gamut it implies) is mostly browns and blues, there's not much to indicate how shadows are represented, and there are large areas of flat color. I also dislike the inset detail box, which is just under a 2x magnification and therefore just browbeats the viewer with information they already have. So I went through Commons, found another piece of pixel art I felt illustrated the concept better, added it to the page and waited a week. Moonreach (talk) 15:20, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 14:11, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Adam Cuerden (talk)Has about 8.9% of all FPs. 22:26, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 05:30, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support - While I still feel that the cat is more encyclopedic, Adam is right that this does strongly resemble something one would find in the (late) 90s. Given that that's the aesthetic modern pixel art games go for, I'm happy supporting. Crisco 1492 mobile (talk) 12:08, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Reminds me on my drawing, it was like this, dots by dots, it was French solider, wish to find that image. --Petar Milošević (talk) 10:54, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 10 Oct 2024 at 18:52:42 (UTC)
- Reason
- Well-composed, high-detail shot of the long-in-the-making Ryugyong Hotel. It was still under construction when this was taken, but the facade was complete.
- Articles in which this image appears
- Ryugyong Hotel, Pyongyang
- FP category for this image
- Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture
- Creator
- Martin Cígler
- Support as nominator – Moonreach (talk) 18:52, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support - Technical quality is rough, but given the difficulty of getting people into North Korea and the never-ending construction this hotel has gone through, it has a timeless quality. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 21:19, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- What's "rough" about it (so I know when considering other photos for FPC)? Moonreach (talk) 13:31, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- It's somewhat soft, but that appears to be due to the age of the image and a high F/. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 17:26, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- What's "rough" about it (so I know when considering other photos for FPC)? Moonreach (talk) 13:31, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Bammesk (talk) 01:03, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Could be Las Vegas too. But streets are perfect for cyclers, no traffic. --Petar Milošević (talk) 10:41, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Yann (talk) 18:48, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 04:35, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 14:11, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support. MER-C 17:06, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Giles Laurent (talk) 16:22, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 9 Oct 2024 at 23:33:43 (UTC)
- Reason
- It is the highest quality image of President Franklin D. Roosevelt, showing a lot of detail of Roosevelt. It is also in color.
- Articles in which this image appears
- Franklin D. Roosevelt
- FP category for this image
- Wikipedia:Featured pictures/People/Political
- Creator
- Leon Perskie
- Support as nominator – Wcamp9 (talk) 23:33, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
- Comment There are several versions of this portrait. Please see c:Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:FDR 1944 Color Portrait.jpg for a former evaluation. Yann (talk) 11:02, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Unusually for me, I support this offcl pol pic because for once the detail of this 80-year-old image is pretty good – and because of the subject's overarching historical EV. Plus, it's a face full of character. – Sca (talk) 12:56, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- PS: Arguably, some highlights do seem rather blown, but .... -- Sca (talk) 15:30, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support - Both this and File:FDR-1944-Campaign-Portrait (retouched, cropped).jpg are excellent. However, this one is cropped somewhat closer (head-room was reduced), and it is stable in the article. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 21:23, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Yann (talk) 18:49, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Moonreach (talk) 15:31, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 04:37, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Giles Laurent (talk) 16:22, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support - GodzillamanRor (talk) 02:10, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 9 Oct 2024 at 23:33:40 (UTC)
- Reason
- The Hindenberg Disaster abruptly ended an era in which airships were very popular, as is known as one of the most famous aviation accidents. These images showed people that airships are dangerous. It is just like the "Oh, the humanity" quote about the disaster, a pretty important piece of media.
- Articles in which this image appears
- Hindenburg disaster
- FP category for this image
- Wikipedia:Featured pictures/History/American
- Creator
- Sam Shere (1905–1982)
- Support as nominator – Wcamp9 (talk) 23:33, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose – per the previous FPC nomination on the same year ZZZ'S 23:39, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose – As said six months ago, this photo has been reproduced countless times ... becoming effectively a bromide (in journalism, a cliché). – Sca (talk) 13:02, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose, per Zzzs. – Hamid Hassani (talk) 04:38, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 9 Oct 2024 at 20:23:05 (UTC)
- Reason
- This is a delisted featured image because the original scan a while ago was low quality. However, there is a way higher quality image in it's place now. Anyway, the poster is historically significant and very famous
- Articles in which this image appears
- Uncle Sam
- FP category for this image
- :Wikipedia:Featured pictures/History/World War I
- Creator
- James Montgomery Flagg
- Support as nominator – Wcamp9 (talk) 20:23, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose – As with the above nom, this image as been reproduced countless times, becoming effectively a cliché. – Sca (talk) 13:06, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Excellent quality reproduction of a significant image. Moonreach (talk) 18:24, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- Also support Alt 1 — Moonreach (talk) 15:23, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
Support- Iconic, and the issues that resulted in the previous image being delisted have been addressed with this most recent upload. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 21:24, 30 September 2024 (UTC)- Support. Matarisvan (talk) 05:42, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Alt – Yann (talk) 18:50, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 04:39, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Discoloured with some obvious damage. Restoration - or even just a colour adjustment - could do miracles on this. A cleaner and larger scan exists at https://www.loc.gov/pictures/resource/ppmsc.03521/ Adam Cuerden (talk)Has about 8.9% of all FPs. 04:38, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
- Adam Cuerden I updated it to the link you sent me, should we make this one an FP Wcamp9 (talk) 21:39, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose per Adam. MER-C 10:47, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
- Still oppose because restoration is required. MER-C 19:32, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose per Adam. Let's get this one right in one. (Struck my vote above). Crisco 1492 mobile (talk) 12:09, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 9 Oct 2024 at 15:32:43 (UTC)
- Reason
- Unanimously featured on Commons. Headline image.
- Articles in which this image appears
- Lavaux, Swiss wine, Tourism in Switzerland
- FP category for this image
- Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Places/Landscapes
- Creator
- Lorenz Poffet
- Support as nominator – MER-C 15:32, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Bammesk (talk) 17:35, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 02:34, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Arguably some DOF issues, but a gorgeous landscape photo. – Sca (talk) 13:11, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Moonreach (talk) 18:24, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Yann (talk) 22:06, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support — UnpetitproleX (talk) 09:24, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 14:09, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Giles Laurent (talk) 16:22, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
Nominations — to be closed
[edit]Nominations in this category are older than ten days and are to be closed. New votes will no longer be accepted.
Older nominations requiring additional input from users
[edit]These nominations have been moved here because consensus is impossible to determine without additional input from those who participated in the discussion. Usually this is because there was more than one edit of the image available, and no clear preference for one of them was determined. If you voted on these images previously, please update your vote to specify which edit(s) you are supporting.
Closing procedure
[edit]A script is available that automates the majority of these tasks: User:Armbrust/closeFPC.js
When NOT promoted, perform the following:
- Place the following text at the bottom of the WP:FPC/subpage:
{{FPCresult|Not promoted| }} --~~~~
- Do NOT put any other information inside the FPCresult template. It should be copied and pasted exactly.
- If the nominator is new to FPC, consider placing
{{subst:NotpromotedFPC|Image name}}
on their talk page. To avoid overuse, do not use the template when in doubt.
When promoted, perform the following:
- Place the following text at the bottom of the WP:FPC/subpage:
{{FPCresult|Promoted|File:FILENAME.JPG}} --~~~~
- Replace FILENAME.JPG with the name of the file that was promoted. It should show up as:
- Promoted File:FILENAME.JPG
- Do NOT put any other information inside the FPCresult template. It should be copied and pasted exactly.
- Add the image to:
- Template:Announcements/New featured content - newest on top, remove the oldest so that 15 are listed at all times.
- Wikipedia:Goings-on - newest on bottom.
- Wikipedia:Featured pictures thumbs - newest on top.
- Add the image to the proper sub-page of Wikipedia:Featured pictures - newest on top.
- The caption for a Wikipedian created image should read "Description at Article, by Creator". For a non-Wikipedian, it should be similar, but if the creator does not have an article, use an external link if appropriate. For images with substantial editing by one or more Wikipedians, but created by someone else, use "Description at Article, by Creator (edited by Editor)" (all editors involved should be clear from the nomination). Additionally, the description is optional - if it's essentially the same as the article title, then just use "Article, by Creator". Numerous examples can be found on the various Featured Pictures subpages.
- Add the image to the appropriate section of Wikipedia:Featured pictures - newest on left and remove the oldest from the right so that there are always three in each section.
- Add the Featured Picture tag and star to the image page using {{Featured picture|page_name}} (replace page_name with the nomination page name, i.e., the page_name from Wikipedia:Featured_picture_candidates/page_name). To add this template you most likely will have to click the "create" button on the upper right if the "edit" button is not present, generally if the image originates from Commons.
- If an edited or alternative version of the originally nominated image is promoted, make sure that all articles contain the Featured Picture version, as opposed to the original.
- Notify the nominator or co-nominators by placing {{subst:PromotedFPC|File:file_name.xxx}} on each nominator's talk page. For example: {{subst:PromotedFPC|File:Blue morpho butterfly.jpg}}.
- If the image was created by a Wikipedian, place {{subst:UploadedFP|File:file_name.xxx}} on the creator's talk page. For example: {{subst:UploadedFP|File:Blue morpho butterfly.jpg}}.
Then perform the following, regardless of the outcome:
- Move the nomination entry to the top of the "Recently closed nominations" section. It will remain there for three days after closing so others can review the nomination. This is done by simply moving the line
{{Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Page name}}
to the top of the section. - Add the nomination entry to the bottom of the October archive. This is done by simply adding the line
{{Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Page name}}
from this page to the bottom of the archive. - If the nomination is listed at Template:FPC urgents, remove it.
Delist closing procedure
[edit]Note that delisting an image does not equal deleting it. Delisting from Featured pictures in no way affects the image's status in its article/s.
If consensus is to KEEP featured picture status, and the image is used in at least one article, perform the following:
- Check that the image has been in the article for at least one week. Otherwise, suspend the nomination to give it time to stabilize before continuing.
- Place the following text at the bottom of the WP:FPC/delist/subpage:
{{FPCresult|Kept|}} --~~~~
- Do NOT put any other information inside the FPCresult template. It should be copied and pasted exactly.
- Optionally leave a note on the picture's talk page.
If consensus is to DELIST, or the image is unused (and consensus is not for a replacement that is used), perform the following:
- Place the following text at the bottom of the WP:FPC/delist/subpage:
{{FPCresult|Delisted|}} --~~~~
- Do NOT put any other information inside the FPCresult template. It should be copied and pasted exactly.
- Replace the
{{Featured picture}}
tag from the image with{{FormerFeaturedPicture|delist/''Image name''}}
. - Remove the image from the appropriate sub-page of Wikipedia:Featured pictures and the appropriate section of Wikipedia:Featured pictures thumbs.
If consensus is to REPLACE (and at least one of the images is used in articles), perform the following:
- Place the following text at the bottom of the WP:FPC/delist/subpage:
{{FPCresult|Replaced|}} with File:NEW_IMAGE_FILENAME.JPG --~~~~
- Do NOT put any other information inside the FPCresult template. It should be copied and pasted exactly.
- Replace NEW_IMAGE_FILENAME.JPG with the name of the replacement file.
- Replace the
{{Featured picture}}
tag from the delisted image with{{FormerFeaturedPicture|delist/''Image name''}}
. - Update the replacement picture's tag, adding the tag {{Featured picture|delist/image_name}} (replace image_name with the nomination page name, i.e., the image_name from Wikipedia:Featured_picture_candidates/delist/image_name). Remove any no longer applicable tags from the original, replacement and from any other alternatives. If the alternatives were on Commons and no longer have any tags, be sure to tag the description page with {{missing image}}.
- Replace the delisted Featured Picture in all articles with the new replacement Featured Picture version. Do NOT replace the original in non-article space, such as Talk Pages, FPC nominations, archives, etc.
- Ensure that the replacement image is included on the appropriate sub-page of Wikipedia:Featured pictures and the appropriate section of Wikipedia:Featured pictures thumbs. Do this by replacing the original image with the new replacement image; do not add the replacement as a new Featured Picture.
Then perform the following, regardless of the outcome:
- Move the nomination entry to the top of the "Recently closed nominations" section. It will remain there for three days after closing so others can review the nomination. This is done by simply moving the line
{{Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/delist/Image name}}
to the top of the section. - Add the nomination entry to the bottom of the archived delist nominations. This is done by simply adding the line
{{Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/delist/Image name}}
to the bottom of the appropriate section of the archive. - If the nomination is listed at Template:FPC urgents, remove it.
Recently closed nominations
[edit]Nominations in this category have already been closed and are here for the purposes of closure review by FPC contributors. Please do not add any further comments or votes regarding the original nomination. If you wish to discuss any of these closures, please do so at Wikipedia talk:Featured picture candidates. Nominations will stay here for three full days following closure and subsequently be removed.
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 9 Oct 2024 at 15:18:22 (UTC)
- Reason
- Unanimously featured on Commons. Headline image.
- Articles in which this image appears
- Social flycatcher
- FP category for this image
- Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds
- Creator
- Chuck Homler
- Support as nominator – MER-C 15:18, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Thanks for the nomination. --Needsmoreritalin (talk) 01:10, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 02:35, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Huge PNG file not helpful. Charlesjsharp (talk) 08:22, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support – In my eyes, it is ZZZ'S 13:19, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- Comment - Per Charles. Plus, PNG suffers from a software glitch where the Wiki fails to sharpen after downsizing, which is a shame given the beautiful plumage. (That being said, kudos to Chuck for providing original resolution images in a lossless format... it really future-proofs the media). — Chris Woodrich (talk) 21:26, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 14:10, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Giles Laurent (talk) 16:22, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
Promoted File:Social Flycatcher.png --Armbrust The Homunculus 15:19, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 8 Oct 2024 at 17:37:11 (UTC)
- Reason
- High quality and resolution
- Articles in which this image appears
- Hip, Hip, Hurrah!, Gothenburg Museum of Art, Impressionism, Peder Severin Krøyer, Skagen, Skagen Painters, Toast (honor), White wine
- FP category for this image
- Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Artwork/Paintings
- Creator
- Peder Severin Krøyer
- Support as nominator – Vinícius O. (talk) 17:37, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
Support– Yann (talk) 18:27, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
- Delist and replace with Alt 1 – Yann (talk) 13:05, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
Oppose - 1px border needs to be cropped out. MER-C 18:51, 28 September 2024 (UTC)- Comment - I've removed the 1px border. However, I seem to recall that the bug that affects PNGs also affects TIF files. Consequently, I've added a JPG copy as ALT1. Also, note that File:'Hip, Hip, Hurrah! Artist Festival at Skagen', by Peder Severin Krøyer (1888) Demisted with DXO PhotoLab Clearview; cropped away black border edge.jpg is currently featured. This should thus be a D&R nomination. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 20:10, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
- Teach me to post before Commons confirms upload. Chunked uploads is still waiting for the server to rebuild the file. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 23:09, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
- Delist and replace with Alt 1 Moonreach (talk) 20:42, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
- Delist and replace with Alt 1 per my above commentary. The current FP has numerous blown highlights, and the image it replaced was better quality. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 23:09, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
- Delist and replace with Alt 1, per Chris Woodrich's commentary. – Hamid Hassani (talk) 03:10, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
- Replace with alt 1. The alternative is also not cropped. MER-C 09:54, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
- Delist and Replace with Alt 1.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 14:10, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
Replaced with File:Hip, Hip, Hurrah! Artists’ Party, Skagen (Peder Severin Krøyer) - Gothenburg Museum of Art - F 62.jpg --– 🌻 Hilst (talk | contribs) 20:58, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 8 Oct 2024 at 18:21:13 (UTC)
- Reason
- high quality image used as lead
- Articles in which this image appears
- Augusta Savage, African-American art
- FP category for this image
- Wikipedia:Featured pictures/People/Artists and writers
- Creator
- unknown US government photographer
- Info In the previous nomination, the picture was mistakenly identified.
- Support as nominator – Yann (talk) 18:21, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose - restoration required. MER-C 18:53, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
- I note the need for restoration as well. Also, I think File:Archives of American Art - Augusta Savage - 2371.jpg better illustrates the subject and her work. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 20:20, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
- It needs a crop and a restoration (and to actually be used somewhere on the English Wikipedia), but otherwise I'd support that one if you want to nominate it. A great encapsulation of an artist and her work. Moonreach (talk) 20:56, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
- There is a crop already, though that still needs restoration. If Yann does not want to do the restoration, I can do it. It's a long weekend for me. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 23:07, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
- This is good also, but should it replace the lead image? Yann (talk) 12:53, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
- That's an editing choice. Honestly, as a lede image I'm thinking File:AugustaSavage.jpg works best (there is less tension in her body than the nominated image, and it still has a sculpture). File:Archives of American Art - Augusta Savage - 2371.jpg and its derivative work best in the body, I think, as her physical identifying features are secondary to her art in that image. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 13:34, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
- This is good also, but should it replace the lead image? Yann (talk) 12:53, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
- There is a crop already, though that still needs restoration. If Yann does not want to do the restoration, I can do it. It's a long weekend for me. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 23:07, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
- It needs a crop and a restoration (and to actually be used somewhere on the English Wikipedia), but otherwise I'd support that one if you want to nominate it. A great encapsulation of an artist and her work. Moonreach (talk) 20:56, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
- I agree, File:Archives of American Art - Augusta Savage - 2371.jpg makes a better FP and it doesn't have to be in the infobox. Bammesk (talk) 17:31, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
- @MER-C, Moonreach, Crisco 1492, and Bammesk: I restored that one. Yann (talk) 21:56, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- I agree, File:Archives of American Art - Augusta Savage - 2371.jpg makes a better FP and it doesn't have to be in the infobox. Bammesk (talk) 17:31, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support ALT - Excellent image. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 22:23, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support ALT – but the left edge has a very narrow white streak! Bammesk (talk) 00:49, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Alt 1 - Moonreach (talk) 13:31, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Conditional support alt 1, provided the white streak is removed. MER-C 18:56, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Done Yann (talk) 17:51, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Alt 1 – Hamid Hassani (talk) 04:41, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Alt 1.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 14:10, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
Promoted File:Archives of American Art - Augusta Savage - 2371 CROPPED.jpg --Armbrust The Homunculus 18:22, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 8 Oct 2024 at 17:37:14 (UTC)
- Reason
- High quality and resolution
- Articles in which this image appears
- Mike Lynch (businessman)
- FP category for this image
- Wikipedia:Featured pictures/People/Business
- Creator
- Royal Society
- Support as nominator – Vinícius O. (talk) 17:37, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Yann (talk) 18:25, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose - Crop is quite close for a 3/4 portrait; generally, these are given more space to breathe. I've made a crop that I think works a bit better, though part of me wants to reduce the aspect ratio somewhat. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 20:17, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose - I don't think this is a particularly good photo; it cuts off in a weird place that shows all of his torso but nothing below it, and he's leaning out of the frame. Chris's crop is better on technical merits but I still don't see anything that makes me think it's among Wikipedia's best images. Moonreach (talk) 20:41, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose – Comparatively little-known man in suit & tie. Scant EV. – Sca (talk) 12:27, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose, per above. – Hamid Hassani (talk) 04:42, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
Not Promoted --Armbrust The Homunculus 17:38, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 8 Oct 2024 at 16:54:04 (UTC)
- Reason
- high quality portrait. "Pope John XXIII surprised those who expected him to be a caretaker pope by calling the historic Second Vatican Council." "The council had a significant impact on the Church due to the scope and variety of issues it addressed."
- Articles in which this image appears
- Pope John XXIII, Extra Ecclesiam nulla salus, Second Vatican Council, etc.
- FP category for this image
- Wikipedia:Featured pictures/People/Religious figures
- Creator
- De Agostini Editore
- Support as nominator – Yann (talk) 16:54, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Vinícius O. (talk) 17:47, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support - A bit iffy on the exposure (head highlights are blown), but given the age, I'm okay with it. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 20:01, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
- Comment — I put it into Krita and checked the levels; they're not fully blown out. There is forehead detail in there, although it didn't look particularly great when I crushed the levels down enough to find it. I'd support an alt that balances things a bit better. Moonreach (talk) 20:49, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
- I messed with this in Photoshop last night, and unfortunately his face falls within the highlight range, so fixing the shine also makes the rest of him look like Lurch. Doing a localized adjustment was somewhat better, but it still ended up looking more grey than recovering detail. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 15:08, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
- Well, thanks for trying. Moonreach (talk) 18:16, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- I messed with this in Photoshop last night, and unfortunately his face falls within the highlight range, so fixing the shine also makes the rest of him look like Lurch. Doing a localized adjustment was somewhat better, but it still ended up looking more grey than recovering detail. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 15:08, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 03:07, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 14:11, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
Promoted File:Ioannes XXIII, by De Agostini, 1958–1963.jpg --Armbrust The Homunculus 16:55, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 8 Oct 2024 at 03:34:16 (UTC)
- Reason
- High quality; historically significant showing The Beatles arriving in America, marking the start of the British Invasion
- Articles in which this image appears
- The Beatles, Beatlemania, British Invasion
- FP category for this image
- Wikipedia:Featured pictures/People/Entertainment
- Creator
- United Press International, photographer unknown
- Support as nominator – Wcamp9 (talk) 03:34, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Yes, that was in my TODO list. Yann (talk) 16:41, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Vinícius O. (talk) 17:47, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 20:13, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose on technical grounds. It's blurry up close; I see banding and macroblocks as well. Moonreach (talk) 20:53, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 03:06, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose – Comparatively indistinct for mid-'60s. Jumbled spot-news comp. – Sca (talk) 12:35, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
- So? If you compare Nixon meeting Elvis (featured image) to the Moon Landing, it’s insignificant in the Nixon presidency. Wcamp9 (talk) 15:56, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support – semi-historic, this is their first arrival to the U.S. (New York City JFK airport). Merits taking an exception for the technical issues. I don't think we have any FPs of them. Bammesk (talk) 17:25, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
- Surely we should find a better image of the Fab Four than this, tho. -- Sca (talk) 15:36, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- And am I really the only one who sees the technical flaws? Look at the man in the fedora (second row, second from right) in full magnification. There's pronounced horizontal banding in the dark areas of his suit, and if you look at his lips and the brim of his hat you can see individual rows of pixels. These things pop up in detail areas all over the picture. I think this image was enlarged to its current size from a smaller copy at some point. Moonreach (talk) 17:09, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Surely we should find a better image of the Fab Four than this, tho. -- Sca (talk) 15:36, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose - I agree, this looks upsampled. MER-C 11:27, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Giles Laurent (talk) 16:21, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
Promoted File:The Beatles arrive at JFK Airport.jpg --Armbrust The Homunculus 06:08, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
President Barack Obama signs S.614, a bill to award a Congressional Gold Medal to the Women Airforce Service Pilots
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 7 Oct 2024 at 16:40:09 (UTC)
- Reason
- high EV image with historical value
- Articles in which this image appears
- Women Airforce Service Pilots, Bernice Falk Haydu, Nicole Malachowski, Dawn Dunlop
- FP category for this image
- Wikipedia:Featured pictures/People/Military
- Creator
- Official White House photo by Pete Souza
- Support as nominator – Yann (talk) 16:40, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
- Comment – Fifteen-year old official White House promo pic. Meh. – Sca (talk) 12:27, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
- Fifteen years later, this still has educational and historical values, that's the point. That's not the case for most White House pictures. Yann (talk) 16:39, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
- Comment – I'm torn on this. I think this is an important event and the photo captures the important aspects of it, but the framing is off-center and the focus was made on Obama, so the women behind him are slightly blurry. Is there any chance this is one from a set of images taken by White House press? Perhaps there are others we could choose from. Moonreach (talk) 20:45, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
- The only equivalent is File:P070109PS-0623 (3679283361).jpg. It lacks the solemnity of the event, and IMO, that's why it is not used. Yann (talk) 13:01, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
Not Promoted --– 🌻 Hilst (talk | contribs) 18:26, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 7 Oct 2024 at 12:00:34 (UTC)
- Reason
- Wikipedia's most extensive, comprehensive, readable and source accurate diagram presenting the division of elves in the world created by Tolkien. The svg format provides lossless scaling. This image has also previously been assessed using the Quality image guidelines and is considered a Quality image.
- Articles in which this image appears
- Elves in Middle-earth
- FP category for this image
- Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Diagrams, drawings, and maps/Diagrams
- Creator
- Agnaton
- Support as nominator – Agnaton (talk) 12:00, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
- Comment – Accessibility of complex information for general readers/viewers seems doubtful. – Sca (talk) 12:43, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
- The divisions of elves in Tolkien's works are a very complex matter. This diagram organizes practically all the knowledge in this area and presents it in the most accessible way possible. Agnaton (talk) 13:14, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Sca - This certainly has value in the articles, but I can't imagine it as a FP on the main page... (FYI I've read LOTR five times, so I'm kind of a fan, but this is just too much...) --Janke | Talk 13:47, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
- I'm sorry you're against it, especially since many of the diagrams have FA status. Agnaton (talk) 13:57, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
- Question Has the colors used been tested to be optimal for persons with sight issues?★Trekker (talk) 23:01, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
- No, but it is also perfectly understandable without colors if needed. Agnaton (talk) 17:33, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
- Comment – It's too soon to nominate this image. The image was added to The article a few days ago. There is currently a discussion about the image on the article's talk page. The image should be renominated at a later time, after there is no longer a discussion about it, and once the image is stable in the article for 7+ days (per FP criterion #5), preferably longer in my opinion. Bammesk (talk) 15:31, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
- To the nominator, image use in non-English Wiki articles is not relevant. I suggest removing those entries from the list above, to declutter. Bammesk (talk) 15:35, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
- The discussion is not about my diagram per se. I started the discussion about current diagram used in Sundering of the Elves, that in my opinion have some errors, and provided my diagram as solution. Agnaton (talk) 17:30, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
- Older version of this diagram was used in Elves in Middle-earth for 5 years, from 2015 to 2020, and in Sundering of the Elves for almost 6 years, from 2015 to 2021. Agnaton (talk) 17:36, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
Not Promoted --– 🌻 Hilst (talk | contribs) 12:09, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 5 Oct 2024 at 16:05:25 (UTC)
- Reason
- Close-up detail of the faravahar, an important symbol in Zoroastrianism, as it appears on the Fire Temple of Yazd. I think the image is technically quite good, I like that this example has color (a lot of the other examples on the faravahar page are simply hewn from unadorned stone), and the mild shadows bring out the relief. Rated a Quality Image on Commons.
- Articles in which this image appears
- Faravahar, Fire Temple of Yazd
- FP category for this image
- Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Culture, entertainment, and lifestyle/Religion and mythology
- Creator
- Bgag
- Support as nominator – Moonreach (talk) 16:05, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Historically interesting image. (Almost seems a precursor of the nazi eagle.) Good detail. – Sca (talk) 13:29, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support – ―Howard • 🌽33 15:00, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Petar Milošević (talk) 19:39, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 10:50, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 03:03, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support — UnpetitproleX (talk) 09:26, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
Promoted File:Faravahar on Fire Temple, Yazd.jpg --Armbrust The Homunculus 16:06, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 4 Oct 2024 at 15:59:34 (UTC)
- Reason
- Animated vision of light wave separation in a prism, as made famous by Pink Floyd. Assessed as a Quality Image on Commons and featured there as media of the day.
- Articles in which this image appears
- Dispersion (optics), Wavelength, Optics, Wave
- FP category for this image
- Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Sciences/Others
- Creator
- Lucas Vieira
- Support as nominator – Moonreach (talk) 15:59, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Bammesk (talk) 01:24, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 10:50, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 15:44, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
- I'm a little worried about the diagram being misleading since it depicts the speed of light as being larger for lower frequencies. Isn't that inaccurate? hinnk (talk) 02:57, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
- It isn't misleading. It's accurate. The fact that higher frequencies travel through more cycles, in a given time span, does not mean (or imply) that they move slower. In air all frequencies are moving at the same speed. In the prism the higher frequencies are moving slightly slower, as they should (in this case 25% slower). Also the relations between frequencies, speeds and angles of deflection are proper. Bammesk (talk) 15:02, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
- Cool, I'll take your word for it. This was an issue in a previous version of the image (see c:File talk:Light dispersion conceptual waves.gif) so I'm glad it's been fully corrected in the current one. hinnk (talk) 23:23, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
- It isn't misleading. It's accurate. The fact that higher frequencies travel through more cycles, in a given time span, does not mean (or imply) that they move slower. In air all frequencies are moving at the same speed. In the prism the higher frequencies are moving slightly slower, as they should (in this case 25% slower). Also the relations between frequencies, speeds and angles of deflection are proper. Bammesk (talk) 15:02, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Yann (talk) 16:43, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 03:02, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support – ZZZ'S 01:32, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
Promoted File:Light dispersion conceptual waves.gif --Armbrust The Homunculus 16:00, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
Suspended nominations
[edit]This section is for Featured Picture (or delisting) candidacies whose closure is postponed for additional editing, rendering, or copyright clarification.