Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Older men-younger women

doesn't seem like an encyclopedia topic delete (rewrite is good, keep) - Mattingly23

Tend to agree. Even if you were interested in the subject, how would you ever find it? Deb 19:59, 14 Aug 2004 (UTC)

Delete. I agree. This is neither necessary nor anything new. Aranel 20:01, 14 Aug 2004 (UTC)
in other news, bears have been found to dispose of waste body matter in highly arboreous areas.~~Delete.~~ Keep --Ianb 20:05, 14 Aug 2004 (UTC)
Oh dear. Delete. Fire Star 20:35, 14 Aug 2004 (UTC)
Keep; rewritten (consider disregarding previous votes). I've moved the article to Age disparity in sexual relationships; I think this topic is perfectly encyclopedic — even if it is a little obvious. Many thanks to Denni for contributing much of the new content, which I took from his rewrite of May-december romance (also on VfD). • Benc • 21:21, 14 Aug 2004 (UTC)
Fair enough. Fire Star 22:10, 14 Aug 2004 (UTC)
Keep: Not the most elegant solutions, but it works to keep a number of topics. We all need to pitch in. Geogre 00:14, 15 Aug 2004 (UTC)
Keep the new page, & the redirects; the news page does have useful info & is encyclopedic. -FZ 15:55, 16 Aug 2004 (UTC)
Keep the new page, now it looks better and encyclopedic Radoneme 18:01, 16 Aug 2004 (UTC)